![]() |
|
|
|||
Robert, the clock will stop to enforce the penalty but then it will be wound on the ready for play. One of the reasons this was done, as bison said, was to prevent Team A from unfairly scrambling to spike the ball. New this year also to NCAA, there is also a 10 second subtraction from the game clock in this case if there is less than a minute to go in the half and either team commits a foul that stops the clock.
We're not using the 10 second subtraction in Texas HS...yet.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
I can't believe they would want to enforce that against a team which is trying to consume time. Can the time deduction be declined?
|
|
|||
Yes, it can be declined. Just like in the NFL.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Yes, the offended team has the option accept the time deduction or not.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
chyme, jeepers creepers! Sounds like somebody took the basketball rule (3 fulls, 2 20s) and went wild with it.
I can't believe they'd change a fundamental commonality between all rule sets. Weird.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Then I guess you like to make assumptions not grounded in fact.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
Except there was a review that determined the game clock should still have 1 second remaining. The officials enforced the penalty (I believe they went with illegal shift) and wound the clock on the ready. While all this was going on, UNC got their FG team ready and snapped it as soon as the RFP was blown. The kick was good and UNC won in OT. The talk of a 10-second subtraction started immediately. Under the old rules though, this foul would not have had a 10-second reduction because the foul itself did not stop the clock (it was the incomplete pass). Adding a rule that if all 11 players are not set before the snap, it is a dead ball false start which would stop the clock. The two rules by themselves would not have changed the outcome last year but combined the game would have been over. For Robert's benefit, the offended team can decline the 10-second reduction. If they accept the reduction, the clock always starts on the RFP. If they decline the reduction, the clock starts on the snap. This overrides any other rules about starting the clock. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WR - false start vs. illegal motion vs. illegal shift | stegenref | Football | 25 | Sat Oct 02, 2010 09:21pm |
Illegal Shift / False Start ?? | linesman | Football | 3 | Sat Sep 11, 2010 07:30am |
False start or Illegal Shift? | bossman72 | Football | 20 | Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:22pm |
shift, false start or nothing | Bubba10Dara | Football | 15 | Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:40pm |
Tight End illegal shift/ False Start | BigGref | Football | 11 | Fri Oct 08, 2004 09:35pm |