The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 10:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Kid gets up shaking the cobwebs and you "think" maybe it was not quite IHC.

I really do think there are too many OHC not called and too many excuses as to why they are not.

40 years of playing and coaching and studying the rules makes me a clown. OK, I get it now!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
Kid gets up shaking the cobwebs and you "think" maybe it was not quite IHC.
Sorry coach, I am not sure what you mean. Yeah, kid gets up shaking cobwebs - that doesn't tell me anything about whether there was illegal helmet contact. Kids get up looking a bit dazed for any number of reasons, right?

Are you actually suggesting that in fact we should wait until the kid gets up, realize he look a little punch drunk , then throw a flag, even if we did not see any illegal helmet contact, because the kid looks a bit dazed?

I know I am kinda of belaboring the point, but I am kind of assuming you mean something other than what you appear to be saying, hence my comment about this maybe being some kind of inside joke that I am not getting - I don't really read the forum religiously, so I might have missed something.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
I am saying, if you are not sure enough to throw the flag but the player who delivers the hit is dazed or someone's helmet comes off or he gets up wobbling and you are not sure that loud clack was helmet on helmet, then it is pretty good bet you should have called IHC. Is it too late? no. Would anyone throw the flag? no. I have had officials tell me that helmet on helmet contact is not a foul. I agree that it could happen incidentally, but most are because a blocker or tackler drove some part of their helmet into an opponent. To say that I don't know what I am talking about because I am just a coach is appalling and to say I am a clown or a troll because I am willing to say that it is not called but a very small percentage of the time is BS. I did post a study by the ATA showing that I am right.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
http://admin.xosn.com/attachments1/4112.pdf

I know this is NCAA stuff but I would say the numbers are similar. Read the article on IHC




As demonstrated with
other rules, coaches are more
prone to react to penalties
that are called. For example,
if multiple violations such as
offside or holding occur
during the game, those will
generally be addressed by
the coaching staff the
following week to correct
those mistakes and hopefully
prevent them from occurring
again. However, it is human
nature not to address issues
that may not be brought to
our attention. When headdown
contact and spearing
fouls are not enforced and
addressed, student athletes
develop poor habits in
blocking and tackling. If left
uncorrected, those actions
may lead to potentially
serious injuries.

Last edited by bigjohn; Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 11:13am.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Editor’s note: This column was
written by Ron Courson, director of
sports medicine at the University of
Georgia.

This Guy must be a Clown.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 218
I think I am going to pass on this discussion at this point. You seem a lot more interested in making this some kind of personal thing than discussing rules and IHC.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
My point all along is that it is not getting called when it happens. I hear excuses why it isn't called. I post data to prove it isn't getting called and that is me being personal? I am the one that has been made light of here.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 12:20pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
Editor’s note: This column was
written by Ron Courson, director of
sports medicine at the University of
Georgia.

This Guy must be a Clown.

Huh?
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
I am saying, if you are not sure enough to throw the flag but the player who delivers the hit is dazed or someone's helmet comes off or he gets up wobbling and you are not sure that loud clack was helmet on helmet, then it is pretty good bet you should have called IHC.
If I am not sure enough to throw the flag based on what I saw, then I am not throwing the flag no matter what the players look like when they get up.

And no, I would not at all agree that a kid shaking off cobwebs is a a "pretty good bet" that I should have called IHC. Is the reverse true - if I throw IHC, and then the kids pop up and look fine, should I wave it off?

Quote:

Is it too late? no. Would anyone throw the flag? no.
I would hope not. Throwing a flag based on how the players respond to a play rather than what you actually see would turn the game into a drama production, rather than a football game. And I suck at evaluating acting ability.

Quote:
I have had officials tell me that helmet on helmet contact is not a foul.
Helmet on helmet contact happens on most blocks and tackles. Of course it is not a foul. The rulebook certainly does not define helmet on helmet contact as a foul. If it defined it in such a manner, it would certainly make it a lot easier to call, but I think the game of football wouldn't really look much like it does now.

Quote:
I agree that it could happen incidentally, but most are because a blocker or tackler drove some part of their helmet into an opponent.
No, mostly it happens because when two people collide with one another, their heads tend to bounce around. I don't think I could make certain my helmet does not hit someone else helmet when I am tackling them if I tried.

Quote:

To say that I don't know what I am talking about because I am just a coach is appalling
I haven't said any such thing.
Quote:
and to say I am a clown or a troll because I am willing to say that it is not called but a very small percentage of the time is BS.
I didn't say that either.
Quote:
I did post a study by the ATA showing that I am right.
I do not agree that the study you posted shows at all that your previous comments about how IHC ought to be called is right, in fact, I think it shows the opposite.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
I am saying, if you are not sure enough to throw the flag but the player who delivers the hit is dazed or someone's helmet comes off or he gets up wobbling and you are not sure that loud clack was helmet on helmet, then it is pretty good bet you should have called IHC.
This, from an officiating stand point, is utter crap. It makes the assumption that a player getting dazed, a helmet coming off, or a loud crack can only happen due to IHC. That is a HUGE assumption that has no basis in fact. You just as well could assume any time a player gets up holding his neck after getting pulled to the ground is because of a face mask grab despite the fact that head can snap around because of hand contact to the helmet or a grab on the inside front of the jersey/shoulder pads rather than grabbing and twisting the mask. The bottom line is we can only call what we see and what we see without a doubt.

The article you posted is revealing in the problem of it not being called enough. We already know IHC is potentially devastating. And the number of times it was called does seem low. Of course the "study" does not tell us how many situations arose in which it could have been called, or how many times the call was passed on because the viewing angle was bad, or the contact was not initiated with the helmet, or the variety of other reasons that you have been told about repeatedly here but refuse to accept why it may not be called.

Do I think IHC is probably not called enough? Absolutely. Do I think the majority of the video examples you have shown us do not rise to the level of it being called for a variety of reasons? Absolutely. You seem to continue with this rant of even if it's close it needs to be called. That's not the way any foul works. Sorry.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 11:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
If we had 11 officials maybe we could get it called, I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 12:35pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
If we had 11 officials maybe we could get it called, I guess.

Not if the only information they had was:
...the player who delivers the hit is dazed or someone's helmet comes off or he gets up wobbling and you are not sure that loud clack was helmet on helmet...

Restated, if the information you provided is the only information they have avaialable, it is unlikely any of the 11 officials would throw a flag.

BJ - Perhaps you should contact your local officials association and work some saturday youth games as an official.
You might just enjoy it...
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 12:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWH View Post
Not if the only information they had was:
...the player who delivers the hit is dazed or someone's helmet comes off or he gets up wobbling and you are not sure that loud clack was helmet on helmet...

Restated, if the information you provided is the only information they have avaialable, it is unlikely any of the 11 officials would throw a flag.
I guess we'd need 22 officials then, each watching a single player.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 12:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
Kid gets up shaking the cobwebs and you "think" maybe it was not quite IHC.

I really do think there are too many OHC not called and too many excuses as to why they are not.

40 years of playing and coaching and studying the rules makes me a clown. OK, I get it now!
I'm not sure I've seen anyone disagree with your statement that "it's not called enough"...because it probably isn't. Some of us didn't think your examples didn't fit the bill as to what we believe is IHC...that's all. The fact that you are not an official yet seem more than credible enough to literally berate most of us with 10, 20, or even more years of experience because we don't see eye to eye on your examples is what got this started. I'm not sure anyone has thrown an excuse out as to why they may or may not call it either. Unless you KNOW you saw it, when and where you saw it...the flag stays put.

The 40 years of experience on the field and from the sidelines isn't what makes you the clown. The fact that you've slammed everyone here who didn't agree with your every word is. Your incredibly confrontational demeanor must pay big dividends on game day.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 30, 2009, 12:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
I do not say a word on game day unless I know there is a misapplication of the rules. I have learned that officials who are not going to call IHC are not going to call it and tell them on game night does not help the situation.
I do not try to show up officials on the field and I will not question calls during a game that are judgment calls.

I have not attacked any one person but I have proven that IHC doesn't get called very often yet I am a bad guy for saying it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Block surehands Football 11 Thu Sep 04, 2008 02:46pm
The good old Block/Charge and when to not call it Tweet Basketball 24 Wed Nov 30, 2005 03:32pm
Block or not? Sven Basketball 4 Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:17pm
difference between cut block and chop block ase Football 7 Mon Nov 29, 2004 11:23am
block, then a block? lrpalmer3 Basketball 10 Thu May 20, 2004 01:18am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1