|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
Cincinnati vs Kentucky Contact Dead Ball Technical Foul (Video)
Regarding an earlier discussion on the merits that the exact same standards of a(n) intentional/flagrant technical foul (dead ball contact) must mean the exact physical requirements for a(n) intentional/flagrant personal foul (live ball contact)...
Quote:
Quote:
Cincinnati vs UK Contact dead ball T...perfect example of contact that would be a common foul during live ball play....but called a T during a dead ball. Quote:
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Why did Ellis (Cin) get away with all that instigating? What Harrison (Ken) did isn't right, but how can the officials ignore the fact that Ellis was the root of the problem (at least here, as I don't know what happened before this sequence)?
|
|
|||
Officials should have had a quick trigger on Ellis, IMO. He had just been tossed from the previous game for a FF2.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Agreed. The Cincy player was the troublemaker here and got away with a lot of instigating.
|
|
|||
This is a great example of how "talking" to the players doesn't always work. We (including myself here) think we can talk to players and get things settled down in these types of situations. Most of the time that works great...but when dealing with known knuckleheads, maybe talking isn't the best way to handle things. If Ellis gets a DB Contact T in the first play, the second probably never happens.
|
|
|||
Ellis is some of the most problematic baggage I've seen a coach have to deal with in a long time. To be humbled by the FF2 he had 2 days before and then come back as if nothing had happened....and act with the same shenanigans? Holy smokes.
|
|
|||
Following the first personal foul the Kentucky player took a swipe at the Cinci player. The Cinci player was no angel, but that action by the Kentucky player meets the definition of a Class A unsporting technical foul. I would penalize him right then. I don't see the actions of anything else in this clip rising to that level. I do not agree with the technical foul that was eventually assessed to the Kentucky player following the second personal foul. Ellis of Cinci actually moved to his right to pick off Harrison as he walks by and makes his shoulder bump look worse. I would tell those two to knock it off and keep an eye them for further issues.
Lastly, please compare the language in 10-3-1d with the text of the new 10-3-2i. Curious that one uses "and" and the other "or" when they are basically the same in the rest of the rule. Why the difference for players versus bench personnnel? Last edited by Nevadaref; Tue Mar 24, 2015 at 01:29pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
Apparently, you would have T'd Ellis during this contest. I don't agree with your assessment. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UGA/Bama Incidental Contact/Technical Foul (Video) | SC Official | Basketball | 35 | Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:12pm |
Oklahoma/Butler Foul and Contact Dead Ball T (Video) | bballref3966 | Basketball | 21 | Tue Dec 02, 2014 10:19am |
Dead ball contact (Video) | JRutledge | Basketball | 29 | Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:42pm |
St. Johns v. Villanova: Dead Ball Contact Technical Foul | APG | Basketball | 14 | Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:13pm |