![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Provided there was an INT foul called on the floor in HS, I think (sadly, but factually) you'd have to count the basket before marching to the other end to shoot the INT foul FTs. Not an issue in NCAAM because a foul by an airborne shooter can never be a PC foul; score the basket regardless. But what about NCAAW? Do you treat a FF1 on this play the same way you do an INT in HS, i.e. the basket is good even though had it been a PC foul it wouldn't have been? |
|
|||
|
Brain Fart
Quote:
![]() Now had the ball entered the basket first somehow, and then the foul by the airborne shooter, now what do you have under the various rule sets? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by AremRed; Thu Mar 19, 2015 at 07:36pm. Reason: removed incorrect information |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
|
#1...Block. It was very close and I wouldn't complain either way. I think the defender was still moving laterally into the path after the shooter left the floor.
#2...Block. Defender was moving towards the opponent at the time of contact. But, again, this was close. He wasn't moving forward much, but he was moving forward.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Under NFHS rules a player control foul MUST be a common foul. An intentional personal foul is not a common foul. Therefore, if the try is already released at the time of the intentional foul by the airborne shooter, then the basket would count. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
|
In real time my gut reaction was PC for 1 and 2.
Upon review and from multiple angles I could see why people could say block on #1. Depending on whether the 2nd step sideways to narrow his stance you consider him finalizing getting position or adjusting the position he already possesses. I still think #2 is a PC. Contact happens before dribbler becomes a shooter so has no expectation of time and space and hits defense with feet on the ground. Didn't see anything in real time for #3 so i could live with no call. Review got it right for #3.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
|||
|
How would the penalty be enforced had the shot gone in on the play with the FF1? Does it nullify the basket?
When they went with the FF1 after review, did they resume play from the spot of the foul or from where the coach requested the timeout? Not the greatest with rule 11. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ohio State vs Penn State Offensive Foul Thoughts? (Video) | acgod24 | Basketball | 20 | Fri Mar 06, 2015 01:09am |
| Louisville vs Ohio State (Video) | bucblue | Basketball | 11 | Wed Dec 03, 2014 02:22pm |
| Jet Man: Video Request for Dayton-Ohio State (Video) | Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. | Basketball | 27 | Sat Mar 22, 2014 07:27pm |
| Michigan State/Ohio State video request x2 9(Clips Added) | zm1283 | Basketball | 7 | Thu Jan 09, 2014 04:55pm |
| Wisconsin / Ohio State Video Req. | Rich | Basketball | 0 | Sun Feb 17, 2013 01:31pm |