![]() |
|
|
|||
Trying to Get My Head Around This
Is there some other rule that prevents them from playing with 4 specifically after a timeout or intermission other than 10-1-9?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
There's a Lot of Money Riding on This
Quote:
Therefore, is it not a logical, sound application of this same rule that, for instance, if a team is caught playing with only four players after a timeout or intermission, that they be then assessed a team technical if/when it is detected that they failed "...to have all players return to the court at approximately the same time following a time-out or intermission"? Especially when that's what 10-1-9 actually says?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
There are two kinds of actuaries: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data... |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
legal entry, substitution |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Re-entry | jkohls | Basketball | 7 | Sun Mar 22, 2009 08:56pm |
DH Re-entry | upscout2000 | Baseball | 1 | Sun Apr 08, 2007 02:33pm |
DH Re-entry | JL87 | Baseball | 8 | Wed Mar 19, 2003 12:30pm |
DH Re-entry | harmbu | Baseball | 3 | Tue Apr 30, 2002 02:34pm |
DH re-entry | PAblue87 | Baseball | 7 | Fri Apr 27, 2001 11:21pm |