Kentucky/UConn PC on spin (video)

I've got nothing.

[BryanV21]

I didn't see much contact at this angle. Guess you had to be there.

[jump stop]

Uconn player would be fined if he was in NBA . nice delayed reaction on flop

[Nevadaref]

Doesn't look like much contact from this angle, bit we have the closed-look. I would be pleased to see the view from the end line (the open-look) which the Lead would have.
If one passes on the contact, the travel which occurs when the right foot is placed back on the floor by the offensive player prior to jumping to shoot must be called.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

If one passes on the contact, the travel which occurs when the right foot is placed back on the floor by the offensive player prior to jumping to shoot must be called.

Technically it is a travel, but one that is not called at this level.

[JRutledge]

I did not see much contact there. But then again he has a better angle.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Technically it is a travel, but one that is not called at this level.

One that is not called at any level. Better yet, a lot of travels are called at the HS level that are never travels (along with carry calls) But you mentioned level as if that means something.

Peace

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Technically it is a travel, but one that is not called at this level.

What does that comment mean?
That officials at the NCAA level are supposed to ignore this clear traveling violation?
That the athletes at the NCAA level are so big and fast that the officials don't see this traveling violation and miss it?
That the officials in NCAA games are looking for the contact/foul and miss the travel?
That the NCAA officials have been instructed to not penalize this footwork?

Please pick one of the above and clarify your statement for us because in my opinion this footwork is clearly illegal and gives the offensive player a huge advantage in getting around a defender near the basket. I don't see how the defender has a fair chance of guarding an opponent who is permitted this extra replacement of the pivot foot prior to jumping. It basically makes the attacking post player unguardable.

[JRutledge]

He is suggesting (what he has suggested for years) that officials deliberately ignore these violations. But he and most never seem to realized, that many of these types of plays are missed. These plays are hard to identify sometimes when you are not only looking for contact, but the feet. And you might not have seen either clearly. It is this stupid myth that NBA just ignores violations and the NF or HS officials are so pure in their application of these violations. I see just as many missed HS traveling calls as I do at all other levels of basketball. That is why traveling IMO is the hardest call to consistently make. And often HS officials call what is "funny" looking, rather than what is actually a violation. This is very much the truth at varsity and lower level games.

Peace

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

What does that comment mean?


That the NCAA officials have been instructed to not penalize this footwork?

That's the one.

The word technical I have seen used by others in this situation. I don't know what that means either. Travels in general and the spin move in particular happen so often without a call that I find it impossible to believe that they were missed. This one is a perfect example.