![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I'm already at the table reporting the foul, so yes! If it happens that it's a 3 man game and the table is late to inform us and I am opposite the table then whomever is close can do the honors. Other than that just do your damn job and stop being concerned with players/coaches feelings, it actually makes officiating much much much much much much much easier.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Yeah ... those 5-6 extra words the 10 times a week someone fouls out is downright exhausting...
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
To me officiating, like anything else in life, is as difficult as I let it be. Like I said earlier, and this is one of my views on life, I have 0/no/none/zilch/nada control over other peoples emotions/feelings/behavior and I do not care about how they "may" react. Informing a coach about anything is just part of the job, and I don't think or see it necessary, as an adult to hand that responsibility over to my partner because I am "scared" of a little confrontation.
I mean some of the excuses and reasons being thrown around reminds me of the sheepish kid who doesn't want to make eye contact with their parents because they fear getting scolded. If you are a good official then you have NO problem dealing with and addressing a coach when needed and penalizing him when warranted. You also don't need your partner to ride in on his white horse. This to me undermines *your* authority in a major way. **DISCLAIMER** Above is my opinion and sentiment on how adults should act and officials should officiate. These views are not of officiating.com or any of it's subsidiaries.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
Why do you keep using the word "scared"? or big scary coach? You are the only one that used it in this thread. They call that projection in many circles. |
|
|||
Because the sentiment is to *NOT* anger or annoy the coach anymore. All the reasons given have been to appease the coach, therefore the safe assumption is to avoid confrontation because the coach *may* get out of hand. Not projection, just some assumption and conclusions.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
I don't particularly care wether I anger or annoy the coach. I am simply enforcing the rules of basketball and administering them according to approved mechanics. If this evokes further reaction from a coach that needs to be handled, I'll handle it. I am very careful to always be professional and to appear very calm in these situations so that the coach has nothing to use as amunition for a real complaint. As we say in my chapter all the time, you will never get zapped for going be the book or for using sound judgemennt but you will get zapped for kicking a rule, poor mechanics, or unprofessionalism.
|
|
|||
Quote:
You say you are at the table already reporting the foul. I didn't know we walked up to the table to report a foul. The new Trail is also there, so they are easily also capable of handling it. Around these parts, I hand out more technicals than most. Those things call themselves. Letting my partner who is the Trail handle the 5th foul administration doesn't mean I'm not doing my job. It means I believe in crew concepts at all times. It's not me on court, it's us on the court. But you do you. As an edit: I'm on the men's side, so we go opposite table. So the trail is always table side. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intentional foul mechanic | rsl | Basketball | 3 | Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:01am |
Spot of foul mechanic | zeedonk | Basketball | 18 | Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:04pm |
fair/foul tag up mechanic | cowbyfan1 | Baseball | 8 | Sun May 01, 2005 08:55am |
mechanic for flagrant foul | scyguy | Basketball | 12 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 06:06pm |
Mechanic on Intentional Foul | golfdesigner | Basketball | 5 | Sun Feb 08, 2004 11:50am |