Pacers vs Heat - Game 5 (Video Request)

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I am not an NBA Rules guru. I am under the impression that these acts have to be treated as a double foul when situations take place during a dead ball against opponents. They do not handle these things (to my knowledge) like they do at other codes. And if you noticed, the only issue was whether a foul should have been given, not how many fouls should have been given because of each action.

Now maybe APG or others more versed on the rules can clarify either way, but that is my understanding of why this was handled that way. I am going to assume that the officials at that level know their rules better then most of us here.

Peace

OK. so what in my original statement are you disagreeing with again? Or are you just having fun trying to disagree?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

OK. so what in my original statement are you disagreeing with again? Or are you just having fun trying to disagree?

I believe you were suggesting that another T should be called for the same event. Not sure that is something I would do in this situation or proper.

Also I believe my statements were first.

Peace

[canuckrefguy]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

OK. so what in my original statement are you disagreeing with again? Or are you just having fun trying to disagree?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I believe you were suggesting that another T should be called for the same event. Not sure that is something I would do in this situation or proper.

Also I believe my statements were first.

[APG]

Just my thoughts:

Could the officials have given Anderson two T's for his actions after the flagrant foul? That's nothing that says they can't if they view the squaring up and shove as two separate actions. From what I see during player altercations and how penalties are divided up, I don't think Anderson's actions warranted two T's. The chest bump and push happen bang bang, so I see no issue with only giving one T. As is, I thought Anderson should have been given a flagrant foul penalty two. But if they thought it was a flagrant foul penalty one, then double T to both players with Anderson getting tossed.

[JRutledge]

I just do not believe in principle giving two different Ts there. It is all in the same action and the official got there to stop anything else.

Peace

[APG]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I just do not believe in principle giving two different Ts there. It is all in the same action and the official got there to stop anything else.

Peace

Do you mean you don't believe that Anderson should have gotten two T's instead of the one he got? I think in an NBA game, that's how this would be handled 9/10 times.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I just do not believe in principle giving two different Ts there. It is all in the same action and the official got there to stop anything else.

In that case, someone should have told Tyler to get in a free shove cuz it's all covered by one T.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by AremRed

In that case, someone should have told Tyler to get in a free shove cuz it's all covered by one T.

So are you saying you give a T for each curse word when players a jawing at each other too?

Everything was directed at the same person in the same sequence. I do not see those as two completely different acts.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I believe you were suggesting that another T should be called for the same event. Not sure that is something I would do in this situation or proper.

Also I believe my statements were first.

Peace

I was not. I said that calls should been a flagrant on Anderson for the live ball contact and ONE T on Andersen for the dead ball action. I was suggesting that there should be no way that Andersen get out of that with ONLY the flagrant.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I was not. I said that calls should been a flagrant on Anderson for the live ball contact and ONE T on Andersen for the dead ball action. I was suggesting that there should be no way that Andersen get out of that with ONLY the flagrant.

He got a T as well after the Flagrant Foul.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

He got a T as well after the Flagrant Foul.

Peace

And that is exactly what I was saying he should have received. :/

If you want to keep arguing for my point, I'll let you have both sides and I'll step aside.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And that is exactly what I was saying he should have received. :/

If you want to keep arguing for my point, I'll let you have both sides and I'll step aside.

I was under the impression he got all those penalties. It seems like you were saying he didn't or you were not aware he got those penalties in the first place.

Peace

[canuckrefguy]

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I was under the impression he got all those penalties. It seems like you were saying he didn't or you were not aware he got those penalties in the first place.

Peace

When this discussion started, he hadn't had all of those penalties, some came after the game was over, remember?