The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 18, 2013, 08:39pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Good, but I think it's best when the officials don't know about the extra ramifications of the T. Too many officials take that information and consider it when deciding to whack or not to whack.
+1000. The penalty is for taking care of the current business. We don't/shouldn't care about the future ramifications of our actions related to penalizing by rule someone else's actions. Had my first flagrant personal foul DQ a few weeks ago where the two bigs were fighting in the paint to get position on a rebound. One started to lose his balance and he grabbed the other guy by the neck and pretty much pile drove him into the floor and landed on his head. My partner thought we should have just gone with an intentional because now the kid had to sit out the next game (this was JV and he was a starter for the V game the same evening.) I am glad I didn't take into account the "sit the next game" penalty as I still feel like the flagrant was warranted.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
+1000. The penalty is for taking care of the current business. We don't/shouldn't care about the future ramifications of our actions related to penalizing by rule someone else's actions. Had my first flagrant personal foul DQ a few weeks ago where the two bigs were fighting in the paint to get position on a rebound. One started to lose his balance and he grabbed the other guy by the neck and pretty much pile drove him into the floor and landed on his head. My partner thought we should have just gone with an intentional because now the kid had to sit out the next game (this was JV and he was a starter for the V game the same evening.) I am glad I didn't take into account the "sit the next game" penalty as I still feel like the flagrant was warranted.
A Varsity starter playing in the preceding JV game?? Seems strange...not done around here. Perhaps good coaching on the JV's part for instigating??
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:26am
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by letemplay View Post
A Varsity starter playing in the preceding JV game?? Seems strange...not done around here. Perhaps good coaching on the JV's part for instigating??
Yeah, many of the small schools only add 2-4 players per level. Ie: Sophomore roster has 8 players, those 8 also dress JV with 3 more juniors, and all of them dress varsity with he addition of 2-3 more seniors.

There was no instigation by the other team, at least in my opinion. I have no reason to believe that that was happening in this game nor have I seen it in other games. However, never really thought about that before. This could be something that could happen to get someone out of a varsity game. i will watch for this more in the future.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Men's wreck league game situation DLH17 Basketball 7 Fri Nov 16, 2012 03:02pm
Wreck league wreport Mark Padgett Basketball 19 Fri Nov 09, 2007 09:03am
Wreck league report Mark Padgett Basketball 6 Thu Nov 01, 2007 05:25pm
Little league question sj Baseball 45 Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:54am
Little League Question His High Holiness Baseball 11 Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1