The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Whoops...

Loose ball...players scrambling...tie up...whistle...AP.

A1 pushes B1...R gives T to A1...as R is reporting...A1 goes after B1 yelling that he is going to get him...U1 seperates (but does not blow whistle for a T)...U1 goes to R and tells him to upgrade to second T and ejection...R says "are you sure we want to eject A1?"...U1 is adamant and says "YES"...

They decide to eject A1 and U1 goes to administer the FT's...

U1 looks up and sees 10 fouls on board for team A...U1 forgets that it was an AP that started all this...and puts up 2 fingers for B2 who is at the line...

B2 misses first FT and makes second FT...B2 stays at line to shoot the next FT's (4 more shots, in U1's mind, for the two technical fouls on A1)

B2 makes the next 3 FT's... A Coach says, "why is B2 shooting an extra FT"...

Officials now realize that U1 gave B2 an extra FT and stops U1 from administering another FT...

B2 had 5 shots and made 4...

Whatta ya got?
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:33pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
First two free throws were not merited. Take one point off the board, award one more T free throw, then throw-in at division line.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
If I understand this all correctly, why would the first two FTs have been unmerited?

Team B had 4 FTs coming its way for the two Ts. Take the result of the first four FTs, eliminate the result of #5, give Team B the ball at the division line and the AP arrow stays where it was before all the craziness began.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 12:38am
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
If I understand this all correctly, why would the first two FTs have been unmerited?

Team B had 4 FTs coming its way for the two Ts. Take the result of the first four FTs, eliminate the result of #5, give Team B the ball at the division line and the AP arrow stays where it was before all the craziness began.
Change it around a bit: A1 goes up for a shot, is fouled and misses the shot and is awarded 2 shots. After the foul, during the dead ball, B1 pushes A2 for a T. The officials erroneously allow A2 to shoot all four FTs. the first 2 go in the second 2 miss. The officials realize their error. Then what do you have?
Here is a hint: I agree with Just another ref.

Last edited by Sharpshooternes; Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 12:40am.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 12:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
First two free throws were not merited. Take one point off the board, award one more T free throw, then throw-in at division line.
...and that, my friend, is why I win the refreshment at our next outing!

That is exactly how I explained this situation...some disagreed with me, and some (the crew that it happened to) decided they should have taken away the first two shots no matter made or missed...and shot one more FT.

Correctable error. Seems simple enough.
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
Change it around a bit: A1 goes up for a shot, is fouled and misses the shot and is awarded 2 shots. After the foul, during the dead ball, B1 pushes A2 for a T. The officials erroneously allow A2 to shoot all four FTs. the first 2 go in the second 2 miss. The officials realize their error. Then what do you have?
Here is a hint: I agree with Just another ref.
Take away A2's first two FT's...allow A1 to shoot two FT's.
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:03am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by RookieDude View Post
...and that, my friend, is why I win the refreshment at our next outing!

That is exactly how I explained this situation...some disagreed with me, and some (the crew that it happened to) decided they should have taken away the first two shots no matter made or missed...and shot one more FT.

Correctable error. Seems simple enough.
We had a thread very similar to this very recently.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
If I understand this all correctly, why would the first two FTs have been unmerited?

Team B had 4 FTs coming its way for the two Ts. Take the result of the first four FTs, eliminate the result of #5, give Team B the ball at the division line and the AP arrow stays where it was before all the craziness began.
That is exactly how the crew handled it...
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
We had a thread very similar to this very recently.
Well, I guess some officials should just spend more time on this forum...

...or in the rule book!
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:12am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by RookieDude View Post
Well, I guess some officials should just spend more time on this forum...

...or in the rule book!
There was disagreement here, too.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
There was disagreement here, too.
There was, but some of those in disagreement ultimately came around.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
Change it around a bit: A1 goes up for a shot, is fouled and misses the shot and is awarded 2 shots. After the foul, during the dead ball, B1 pushes A2 for a T. The officials erroneously allow A2 to shoot all four FTs. the first 2 go in the second 2 miss. The officials realize their error. Then what do you have?
Here is a hint: I agree with Just another ref.
This is different than the OP since the sequence you describe begins with a shooting foul for one player but another takes his shots, as opposed to the held ball situation. In your scenario of course you wipe the first two since A1 was supposed to take them.

Unless I'm just not computing things properly because I'm really tired, the only fouls in the OP were dead-ball contact Ts which means anyone can take them. B2 got the four FTs he/his team was supposed to get within those first four shots.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
This is different than the OP since the sequence you describe begins with a shooting foul for one player but another takes his shots, as opposed to the held ball situation. In your scenario of course you wipe the first two since A1 was supposed to take them.

Unless I'm just not computing things properly because I'm really tired, the only fouls in the OP were dead-ball contact Ts which means anyone can take them. B2 got the four FTs he/his team was supposed to get within those first four shots.
They may have but the what-if involving a different shooter reveals the fact that the first shots were the ones awarded for a foul that wasn't committed and are the ones to be corrected.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
B2 got the four FTs he/his team was supposed to get within those first four shots.
...yes, but you shoot the FT's in the order they happened.

Since U1 gave two unmerited FT's...you must correct that and take them away...then give one more FT for the 4th Technical FT that has not been shot yet.

I'm tired also...
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
They may have but the what-if involving a different shooter reveals the fact that the first shots were the ones awarded for a foul that wasn't committed and are the ones to be corrected.
Okay. I wasn't processing the whole "U1 thought..." part of the equation. The joys of hindsight since I knew from reading the OP that there wasn't a foul at the start of the whole mess.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whoops UmpireInVA Softball 4 Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:51pm
Whoops! hawk65 Softball 31 Thu Mar 13, 2008 08:50pm
whoops (funny) ChrisSportsFan Softball 5 Tue Apr 12, 2005 01:54pm
"Timeout!".....whoops Danvrapp Basketball 4 Thu Apr 26, 2001 04:16pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1