Sub question

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

If he strings them out, they're not all getting in. The 2nd one wasn't at the table in time to be beckoned in with the first one to they have to wait until the next opportunity to sub...at least not the way we're told to do it here.

We (I) haven't been told that. I've obviously never had a string of ten, but I have seen three or four strung out.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Wasn't there a ruling or interpretation that actually we only were supposed to allow subs that were all at the table at the same basic time? I hate old rulings that do not show up in current casebook plays, but I almost sure I remember where the 10 different substitutes was not what we were supposed to allow in the first place.

Peace

I'd like to see that. It makes sense.