The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 16, 2012, 04:56pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Anybody seen the actual wording of the new rules?

I'm reviewing old quizzes and I know that there were changes to the team control rules. My guess is that they changed it back so that there's no player or team control during a throw-in, but it's just a guess.

Has anybody seen a release of the actual changes that were made?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 16, 2012, 05:53pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
I'm reviewing old quizzes and I know that there were changes to the team control rules. My guess is that they changed it back so that there's no player or team control during a throw-in, but it's just a guess.

Has anybody seen a release of the actual changes that were made?
4-19-7 A team-control foul is a common foul committed by a team that has team control (including a member of the throw-in team from the start of the throw-in until player control is obtained inbounds).

Rationale: The committee adopted a team-control rule change for last season which introduced some complications for a number of other rules. These complications were handled through interpretations last year. The addition of this parenthetical statement allows all rules affected by the team-control definition change last season to revert to their previous verbiage and brings the rule in line with the interpretations that were released last year.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 16, 2012, 06:12pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Until I get a book in my hands....
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:42pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
4-19-7 A team-control foul is a common foul committed by a team that has team control (including a member of the throw-in team from the start of the throw-in until player control is obtained inbounds).

Rationale: The committee adopted a team-control rule change for last season which introduced some complications for a number of other rules. These complications were handled through interpretations last year. The addition of this parenthetical statement allows all rules affected by the team-control definition change last season to revert to their previous verbiage and brings the rule in line with the interpretations that were released last year.
I don't like that the parenthetical statement begins with the word "including". That means that a member of the throw-in team during the throw-in is included in the group "a team that has team control". Even though I think that's not what they actually mean.

So what I really need to see is the definitions of player control and team control. Have we seen exactly how the "previous verbiage" was used?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 16, 2012, 09:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
I don't like that the parenthetical statement begins with the word "including". That means that a member of the throw-in team during the throw-in is included in the group "a team that has team control". Even though I think that's not what they actually mean.

So what I really need to see is the definitions of player control and team control. Have we seen exactly how the "previous verbiage" was used?

Agree. Still poorly worded, but certainly much better than the mess we had last year.

It is my understanding that PC and TC are going back to the exact wording of before and that only the definition of a TC foul was changed to have it include the time during a throwin.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 03:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
I don't like that the parenthetical statement begins with the word "including". That means that a member of the throw-in team during the throw-in is included in the group "a team that has team control". Even though I think that's not what they actually mean.

So what I really need to see is the definitions of player control and team control. Have we seen exactly how the "previous verbiage" was used?

Reading my 2012-2013 book right now....

4-12-2 D When a player of the team has disposal of the ball for a throw-in.... seems the same as 11/12.


4-19-7. A Team control foul is a common foul committed by a member of the team that has control ( including a member of the throw-in team from the start of the throw-in until player control is obtained inbounds)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 06:42am
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Copyright Issues ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Still poorly worded, but certainly much better than the mess we had last year.
I'm not a college official, not do I play one on television, but didn't the NCAA take care of tis several years ago. Why didn't the NFHS just "copy" the NCAA wording?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 26, 2012, 08:28am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Just got my book today and they didn't change it!!!!!

Why would they change the definition of a team control foul but NOT fix the rule change that caused the problem in the first place???????

So SO stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 26, 2012, 08:56am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
WOW. I actually had hope for change.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 26, 2012, 09:08am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Some people will say the wording of the rules don't matter, we should just know to apply certain rules like they were written in 2010-11.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 26, 2012, 11:05am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Some people will say the wording of the rules don't matter, we should just know to apply certain rules like they were written in 2010-11.
Yep, but I saw enough established vets (good officials) who wanted to apply the new TC rule last year to situations that the NFHS had clarified they didn't want (BC on a throw-in situation, for one). The little power points and explanations for rules changes don't get disseminated like the NFHS thinks they do.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 03, 2012, 11:45am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
And they didn't even bother to change 9-9-1, so we have the same problems with the backcourt rulings as last year.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 03, 2012, 12:19pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Throw 'Em To The Lions ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
And they didn't even bother to change 9-9-1, so we have the same problems with the backcourt rulings as last year.
Those b*stards!
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now, for some actual baseball Rich Baseball 41 Fri Jun 22, 2012 07:33am
Changing of wording on the Rules Myths thread TwoBits Baseball 3 Mon Mar 31, 2008 06:06pm
Actual Sportsmanship Going On nickrego Baseball 2 Thu May 11, 2006 07:44am
An actual rules question, for a change ChuckElias Basketball 72 Thu Sep 22, 2005 08:16am
Closer to official wording - rules changes Dakota Softball 4 Fri Nov 22, 2002 07:14am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1