Local politics blues

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

FYI, in Portland, we changed the vote weighting last year to not give the coaches so much power. They still have a vote but it is now unweighted....1 coach vote = 1 officials vote.

Previously, the coaches vote was weighted inversely proportional to the ratio of coaches to officials that submitted ballots. Since there are far more officials voting than coaches, under the prior system, a individual coaches vote counted 2.5-4 times as much as an individual officials vote.

I think it is good to keep the coaches involved in the process. They are our customers. The only question is how to include them and how much. We generally need to keep the coaches happy as a group (but not necessarily as individuals). The thing that keeps all things in check is that if an official goes out of their way to make one coach happy, the other coach will be pissed and that will catch up with the official.

As an outsider looking in I'm curious: are the coaches' ratings in your area taken within the context of what happened in a particular game? For example, if a coach gives someone a lousy rating in a game their team lost by 40 while the other coach gives them a great rating it would seem that should be taken into account.