![]() |
|
|||
|
The play in question:
Under NFHS and NCAA rules, this is a clear violation. It is not so under NBA rules. The defense bats the ball away...thus that ends team control. Turiaf then tries to control the ball..the first initial push to the floor could be considered control...thus he had a positive position in the frontcourt with the ball and the subsequent actions would constitute a backcourt violation. If the calling official did not believe that constituted control, when Turiaf gains control of the ball, he's in the air...he has not attained a positive position with the ball. His right foot lands in the front, and his left foot appears as though it might have landed on the midcourt line. This would mean he attained a positive position with the ball in the backcourt...which in this case would be legal.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. Last edited by APG; Fri Apr 13, 2012 at 06:46pm. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| back court question from MU v Tex game | ballgame99 | Basketball | 18 | Tue Jan 31, 2012 01:41pm |
| Back-court or not and Why? | bd41flpk | Basketball | 7 | Wed Dec 08, 2010 09:00am |
| Back Court vs. Front Court. | MagnusonX | Basketball | 72 | Sun Oct 17, 2010 08:34am |
| Back Court or Not | BBallEvaluator | Basketball | 3 | Sun Jan 24, 2010 01:43pm |
| i saw an illegal call by the ref in the bulls/rockets game | PackersFTW | Basketball | 34 | Wed Feb 04, 2009 07:39pm |