Backcourt Violation Question

[Adam]

Disposal now equals TC as well. Maybe that's what he meant.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Huh? The only examples of "live ball, clock not running" I can think of are on a throw-in (no TC), FT (TC, but also PC), or jump ball (no TC).

A TO can be granted when there's PC or the ball is "at the disposal" of the team. TC does not enter into it (other than PC also causes TC).

Maybe I'm missing something.

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Disposal now equals TC as well. Maybe that's what he meant.

Snaqs, you are wise beyond your years. That's what I meant. No PC when the ball is at the disposal of the thrower-in but there is TC.

Even though I forgot to include there is one exception to "TC, live ball, clock not running" for which we can't grant a time-out, which is after the throw-in has been released but before it has been legally touched.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Even though I forgot to include there is one exception to "TC, live ball, clock not running" for which we can't grant a time-out, which is after the throw-in has been released but before it has been legally touched.

Which is why your method of trying to discern between when to use PC and when to use TC is confusing (to me).

Just go by the PC or disposal, all the time.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Which is why your method of trying to discern between when to use PC and when to use TC is confusing (to me).

Just go by the PC or disposal, all the time.

Or that.

But my original statement had context in that I responding to someone who was talking about TC in regards to granting a time-out.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Snaqs, you are wise beyond your years.

You take that back; I'm no Yankee fan regardless of what you've been told.