![]() |
|
|
|||
LGP grants the right to move and jump. Without it a player doesn't have the right to do either when contact occurs. Here is the rule on verticality...
Verticality applies to a legal position. Following are the basic components of the principle of verticality:So, until they have LGP, they may have a legal spot by getting there first but when they jump without having LGP, they forfeit the right to their spot....in a sense, they're moving to a new spot above the one they started from and the verticality rule doesn't allow them to do so.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Fri Jan 27, 2012 at 07:35pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
A-1 is guarded by B-2, who is in the lane and facing A-1 (has LGP). A-1 passes to A-3, who drives and goes airborne. B-2, who is not facing A-3 but remains on his spot, jumps straight up. There is body contact between A-3 and B-2. Blocking foul?
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination. |
|
|||
Quote:
Player A1 catches a pass near 3 point line, and squares up to shoot. B1 arrives too late to contest the shot, so he takes a position in front of A1 with his back to him intending to box him out. He turns to see A1 still holding the ball, looking into the post. He jumps straight up with his hands up, hoping to deflect the pass. A1 puts the ball on the floor and plows into B1's back. Ruling: blocking foul on B1 not bloody likely
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
The RA doesn't allow ILGP to be obtained in there, but by your logic, a secondary defender doesn't need LGP to draw PC foul in the RA if he's not moving when contact occurs, even though they made it clear that no secondary defender can be there no matter how long they've been stationed in there. |
|
|||
Quote:
2) It's clear that the rule says something to the effect that "a player is entitled to his/her spot on the floor provided s/he gets there legally first." Standing in the RA is NOT getting there "legally." 3) Your'e wrong about his logic. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Three for the opponent? | bainsey | Basketball | 12 | Wed Jan 25, 2012 01:08am |
Batting the puck into the net off an opponent | John Robertson | Hockey | 3 | Sat Nov 04, 2006 03:08pm |
RHP in stretch facing 1st base (balk or no balk) | tem_blue | Baseball | 6 | Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:00pm |
Ejected Coach...first time facing since ejection | Raymond | Basketball | 9 | Wed Feb 08, 2006 01:34pm |
Lining: "Facing the play" | sir_eldren | Hockey | 3 | Thu Aug 12, 2004 12:49pm |