The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 05, 2011, 08:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
That seems like a lot of words to replace "optional."
To say that a mechanic is optional is ambiguous between:
a) an official opting never to use the mechanic, and
b) an official opting to use it only occasionally when needed to communicate

I think you're using it in sense (b) and JR is rejecting sense (a). You're in violent agreement.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 05, 2011, 09:47am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
To say that a mechanic is optional is ambiguous between:
a) an official opting never to use the mechanic, and
b) an official opting to use it only occasionally when needed to communicate

I think you're using it in sense (b) and JR is rejecting sense (a). You're in violent agreement.
Perhaps, but I was responding to this exchange in particular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post


Optional signal in the IAABO Manual. Mandatory here in the Constitution State.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee View Post
Signal #12 in the NFHS rule book.

Stoopid IAABO monkeys want to make up their own damn rules.....
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 05, 2011, 10:20am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
The NFHS is clear in how they want the signal used. I already gave their issued reference for that. I have no idea whatinhell IAABO regards as being optional or mandatory, nor do I really care. If IAABO wants to issue their own exam, mechanics and rules interpretations, they're free to do so. It doesn't help non-IAABO officials though when they issue something that is completely contrary to what the NFHS has issued and goes against FED rules or doctrine.

Also as a general observation, I do think that sometimes you just have to referee the game and quit trying to micro-analyze every single facet of it. The usage of this particular signal is a prime example of that imo. It's no more or no less than exactly how the FED told us to use it when they initiated it.

JMO
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 05, 2011, 10:24am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
b) an official opting to use it only occasionally when needed to communicate
I think that's how the NFHS directed all of us to use it when they initiated the signal. And I think I cited their words to that effect above.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5 second closely guarded bellnier Basketball 6 Sun Aug 13, 2006 09:51am
closely guarded missinglink Basketball 21 Wed Dec 03, 2003 05:34pm
Closely guarded cowbyfan1 Basketball 21 Sat Oct 25, 2003 09:10am
Closely Guarded? Richard Ogg Basketball 5 Sat Dec 01, 2001 08:47pm
Closely Guarded Camron Rust Basketball 7 Wed Jun 07, 2000 02:17pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1