The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 05:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
First off, sorry for the long post.
In the 20 years since I played basketball in HS and the time I am now picking it up in officiating, there has been a number of big time rule changes. 3 point shot, block charge on players with a foot on the OOB (was a big teaching point by my coaches to do that in HS), the limited number of players allowed along the free throw lane during a foul shot), here is one I am confused about, closely guarded violation. I have seen official counting it in collage games but never got into what exactly and why they were doing it.

I am reading this that if a defender is within 6 feet of the Offensive player with the ball, the offensive player has 5 seconds to get rid of the ball.
But I also read it that if the offensive player is dribbling the ball and stops dribbling, the 5 second count stops and a new one starts, meaning he now has 5 more seconds to pass the ball (or shoot). Am I interpeting this correctly?
Also if a defender is 6 feet from the player do you not overly concern yourselves with the count? In other words, does the defender have to make a more serious attempt to play defense say from 2, 3, or 4 feet away as opposed to 6?
For example defense is in a 2-3 zone with the guards on the foul line and the point guard dribbles to just off the top of the key. The defensive guards make no attempt to move towards the ball handler. They are obviously within 6 feet of one another, do you start your count?
What if the ball handler backs away and is now 7 or 8 feet away, do you stop the count if the defense does on follow?

thanks.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 07:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by cowbyfan1

I am reading this that if a defender is within 6 feet of the Offensive player with the ball, the offensive player has 5 seconds to get rid of the ball.
But I also read it that if the offensive player is dribbling the ball and stops dribbling, the 5 second count stops and a new one starts, meaning he now has 5 more seconds to pass the ball (or shoot). Am I interpeting this correctly?
Yes. A closely-guarded player could hold for 4.99999 seconds, dribble for 4.99999 seconds and hold again for 4.99999 seconds w/out committing a violation


Quote:
Also if a defender is 6 feet from the player do you not overly concern yourselves with the count? In other words, does the defender have to make a more serious attempt to play defense say from 2, 3, or 4 feet away as opposed to 6?
For example defense is in a 2-3 zone with the guards on the foul line and the point guard dribbles to just off the top of the key. The defensive guards make no attempt to move towards the ball handler. They are obviously within 6 feet of one another, do you start your count?
Ignoring your math (if the dribbler is at the top of the key, a defender on the FT line would need to be at the center of the FT line to be within 6 feet), as a practical matter, count when there's actual guarding.

Quote:
What if the ball handler backs away and is now 7 or 8 feet away, do you stop the count if the defense does on follow?

thanks.
Yes -- as soon as the 6' distance is exceeded, stop the count.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 08:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 275
Red face More on closely guarding

The defender must be guarding the person with the ball. This means that if another offensive player sets a screen and the defender moves behind the screen, he may stay within 6 feet, but it would be impossible to be guarding one person through another, so the count would stop and restart as soon as he re-establishes the guarding position.

Another thing to consider is that the defensive team must be closely guarding the person with the ball. I have never called it, but have seen it called. In a zone defense, a person with the ball may be closeley guarded by one person, a second person may start guarding person the ball before the first releases him as he moves through the zone. If this occurs, you stay on the count without restarting it.

Best of luck to you.
__________________
Damain
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 08:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to OldCoachNewRef
Even on a person to person defense, if the switching is good and the next defender is within the 6 feet allowance, the 5 seconds continues. Just so there is no confusion that it has to be a zone in order for the closely guarded to continue.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 08:40am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Exclamation

Frontcourt Closely-guarded Action

"9.10.1 Situation C: Team A has the ball in its own frontcourt. B1 stands within 6 feet and facing A1 while A1 is holding the ball near the division line. Ruling: In five seconds this would be a violation. In the situation outlined, as soon as B1 has assumed a guarding position, both feet on the floor, facing the opponent, no other specific requirement is in effect. The amount of movement or the actual body position of the player is irrelevant."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 09:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 82
Send a message via AIM to bludevil1221
What if B1 is closely guarded by A1, and A2 comes up and double teams B1, but A1 backs off. Would the count continue if the defenders change?
__________________
"Life changes when you least expect it to. So, sieze this day, this moment, and make the most of it" -Jim Valvano
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 09:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by bludevil1221
What if B1 is closely guarded by A1, and A2 comes up and double teams B1, but A1 backs off. Would the count continue if the defenders change?
Yes. This is just what OldCoachNewRef said about 3 posts ago. See 9.10.1B
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 09:56am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by bludevil1221
What if B1 is closely guarded by A1, and A2 comes up and double teams B1, but A1 backs off. Would the count continue if the defenders change?
Frontcourt Closely-Guarded Action
"9.10.1 Situation B: While dribbling in A's frontcourt, A1 is closely guarded by B1. After two seconds, B2 also assumes a closely-guarded position on A1, and B1 leaves to guard A2. Ruling: There is no requirement for the defensive player to remain the same during the count as long as A1 is closely-guarded throughout."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 82
Send a message via AIM to bludevil1221
Unhappy

Soory bout that....
__________________
"Life changes when you least expect it to. So, sieze this day, this moment, and make the most of it" -Jim Valvano
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 12:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Re: More on closely guarding

Quote:
Originally posted by Damian
The defender must be guarding the person with the ball. This means that if another offensive player sets a screen and the defender moves behind the screen, he may stay within 6 feet, but it would be impossible to be guarding one person through another, so the count would stop and restart as soon as he re-establishes the guarding position.
That's the first I've ever heard that. Just becuase a screener passes between the guard and the dribbler doesn't mean that LGP is lost. There is even a related case book play that explicitly say that the count can continue when there are screening teammates between the guard and the ball handler (quoted below). The count continues through screens.

For that matter, LGP is NOT required for a closely guarded count. LGP is only necessary in determinine who a foul is on if there is contact.

9.10.1 SITUATION D: Team A, while in possession of the ball in its frontcourt: (a) positions four players parallel with the sideline and they pass the ball from one to another with their arms reaching beyond the sideline plane; or (b) has four teammates surround dribbler A1. In both (a) and (b), the opponents are unable to get close to the ball. Ruling: This is considered to be a closely-guarded situation and a violation in five seconds in both (a) and (b), if any B player is within 6 feet of the ball or within 6 feet of the screening teammates and is attempting to gain control of the ball. Preventing opponents from getting to the ball by using screening teammates becomes a violation in five seconds if the opponents are attempting to gain control.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 02:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Philadelphia, Ohio
Posts: 107
Just to throw another thought out on this rule. The rule has been modified in NCAA women's rules this year.

Rule 9-13 art. 1 b (2) -- A player in control of the ball, but not dribbling, is closely guarded when an opponet is in a guarding stance within 3 feet. A closely guarded violation shall occur when the player in control of the ball holds the ball for more than five seconds.

The rule for women for the past several years only includes a player that is holding the ball (no 5 second count when dribbling). The changes this year include the space requirement going down to 3 feet instead of 6, and the wording "guarding stance" describing the defender. Thus the defender must be actively guarding the ball holder.

One more reminder about this rule difference in womens, mens and NF -- you can have a 5 second count in the backcourt in women's ball -- not men's or NF.
__________________
If it's not one thing -- it's your Mother.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 04:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,281
You can have a 5 second count in womens NCAA because they dont have the 10 second call ( personally a stupid rule)

I just want to know how Bob counts to 4.99999 before he calls a violation. You got some precision timing thing I dont know about. I am luck I can count -- They invented the 10 second count for me. If it were any longer I would have to take my shoes off in the middle of the game!

My suggestion as a newer official. Learn to make a very visible, strong 5 second signal and be consistent. Know when it starts and start it. Dont let the coaches cajole or whine you into starting it

Change hands when you switch from the hold to dribble to hold.

See the Iraqi sun has not fried my brain too bad.
BTW our record 92 days of 100 plus temps ( hit 150 out thermometers could not go any higher) with at least 106 out of 109 day above 100...

Damn give me a heated contest between the two hottest cross town rivals in a packed Rupp arena over this!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 05:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Kelvin green
Damn give me a heated contest between the two hottest cross town rivals in a packed Rupp arena over this!
Well, duhuhuh!!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 07:06pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by Kelvin green

See the Iraqi sun has not fried my brain too bad.
BTW our record 92 days of 100 plus temps ( hit 150 out thermometers could not go any higher) with at least 106 out of 109 day above 100...

Damn give me a heated contest between the two hottest cross town rivals in a packed Rupp arena over this!
Be well, Kelvin.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 22, 2003, 07:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Kelvin green

See the Iraqi sun has not fried my brain too bad.
BTW our record 92 days of 100 plus temps ( hit 150 out thermometers could not go any higher) with at least 106 out of 109 day above 100...

Damn give me a heated contest between the two hottest cross town rivals in a packed Rupp arena over this!
Stay safe, keep your spirits up, your head in the game and don't take any chances. The year will be up before you know it and you'll be back home with your best gal on your arm & a cool one in your hand!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1