![]() |
|
|
|||
This thread kinda warped over time, did it not? The OP, I think, recognized the relative importance of the final seconds in the scheme of things. He also feels, apparently, that a bad no-call is better than a bad call. I would agree. But what I get out of the OP is that he is asking if he should change his standard of making a call in the final seconds to help avoid making a bad call in this circumstance. I think most of us agree the answer to this is no.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it. |
|
|||
Quote:
Your standard for fouls needs to be the same from tip to final horn. The idea that a correctly called foul takes the game away from the players needs to be rejected for the mistaken belief that it is. |
|
|||
I agree that you shouldn't call a foul unless you're 100% sure it's a foul, but that doesn't mean that it's better to miss a foul than call a phantom foul. Both are equally bad, we just choose to err on the side of not calling fouls (as we should due to the other effects of a foul - disqualification, bonus, etc).
|
|
||||
When you say it's better to err on the side of missing something rather than calling something that isn't there, it absolutely does mean that.
You want to make 100% sure there's a foul before you call it. You do not have to be 100% sure there isn't a foul before letting it go. The concept applies all game long. You obviously don't want to make either mistake, but you've already admitted we choose to err on one side vs the other.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Agreed. Doubting oneself in any tough decision is natural. But doubting yourself on a call because of the reaction of fans, is not something that should happen at all.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Good example of the false magnification of the importance of a call at the end:
Years ago, one of the first varsity games I ever called. Visitors trailed the entire game, the outcome was apparently decided. Mostly subs were in the game. Visitors threw in some 3's, got a couple of turnovers, and all of a sudden it's a one point game in the last few seconds. Pressure in the backcourt and the ball is knocked out, home to inbound right in front of visitors bench with 1 second on the clock. V1, 6'5" center, pressures the throw-in, extending over the line up to his armpits. I give the warning. He backs up, then, on the count of 3, steps up and does the same thing again. T Visitors bench threw a fit. Home missed both free throws, threw it in, and the game was over. V principal called my assignor to complain about the call, saying, among other things, that it had cost them a chance to win the game. On the contrary, had I not made this (proper) call, and the pressure resulted in a turnover, it would have given them a chance to win which they should not have had.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happened to the T to start the game--NCAA Game thread? | w_sohl | Basketball | 1 | Tue Mar 10, 2009 01:32pm |
Jordan's 63 pt game - Game 2 of 1st round 1986 Eastern Conference Playoffs | Cajun Reff | Basketball | 15 | Fri Mar 07, 2008 09:56am |
Twenty technicals in one game - all for delay of game! | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 14 | Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:55pm |
Next game teams warming up on field during game | reccer | Softball | 6 | Mon Jul 16, 2007 03:00pm |
Cursed Game: 3 Injuries, 2 ambulance calls, 1 game | wadeintothem | Softball | 3 | Mon Oct 16, 2006 04:48pm |