The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 08:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 83
Violation?

BJV game. A8 scores. B2 has possession of ball and steps one foot out of bounds and lifts the other over a spot inbounds. The ball never passes through the line out of bounds.
So he has something out and nothing touching inbounds while holding the ball on the inbounds side of the line. He passes to B4.

Legal play or violation?
NFHS rules.


The crew whistled a violation and team A was awarded the ball for a throw in.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 08:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Southeast
Posts: 25
All you need to establish in or out of bounds is one foot. Ball position is not a factor.
__________________
"...for by His stripes we are healed." Isaiah 53:5
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 09:18am
Official & Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by The R View Post
...So he has something out and nothing touching inbounds while holding the ball on the inbounds side of the line...
Legal Play. Player is out of bounds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The R View Post
The crew whistled a violation and team A was awarded the ball for a throw in.
Are you 100% sure the players foot was completely out?
__________________
Calling it both ways...since 1999
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 09:27am
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
OOO. Happens all the time.

Now, if you had said he stepped a little bit on the court..... well, that opens up a whole new school of thought and discussion.
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 83
From my angle the foot was 100% OOB. (I was sitting quite a few rows up to the side of the baseline where this happened.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Zebra View Post
Legal Play. Player is out of bounds.

Are you 100% sure the players foot was completely out?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
OOO. Happens all the time.

Now, if you had said he stepped a little bit on the court..... well, that opens up a whole new school of thought and discussion.
Hey Grune let's say he was never completly OOB and passed the ball in....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 10:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,199
You would probably then end up with a 5-second violation if the players don't recognize what happens and goes back to make a proper throw-in.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 10:50am
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Ed Zackery!

Quote:
Originally Posted by The R View Post
Hey Grune let's say he was never completly OOB and passed the ball in....
Let me ask this, on inbounding endline violations do you ALWAYS blow the whistle or only sometimes? 30 point blowout? Only during a close game? When there's no one there but you and the player to see it (and the player doesn't even know)? 5th grade level? Varsity HS level?

Game management vs so what vs who cares vs really?
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 11:27am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
Now, if you had said he stepped a little bit on the court..... well, that opens up a whole new school of thought and discussion.
You would probably then end up with a 5-second violation if the players don't recognize what happens and goes back to make a proper throw-in.
This is an immediate throw-in violation. Don't wait for the 5-second count. The NFHS issued an interp on this a few years ago. I'm sure it's in the "archive" thread.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 11:28am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
Let me ask this, on inbounding endline violations do you ALWAYS blow the whistle or only sometimes? 30 point blowout? Only during a close game? When there's no one there but you and the player to see it (and the player doesn't even know)? 5th grade level? Varsity HS level?

Game management vs so what vs who cares vs really?
This was recently NOT called in a University of Kansas game, where there was no pressure on the throw-in, and it ended up on the Arbiter in a video bulletin telling NCAA officials to call it, regardless of time/score/pressure.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 11:48am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
This was recently NOT called in a University of Kansas game, where there was no pressure on the throw-in, and it ended up on the Arbiter in a video bulletin telling NCAA officials to call it, regardless of time/score/pressure.
We discussed it here, too. Thanks for adding this, as I wondered if the officials would be getting the official finger wag (proverbially, of course).
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
This is an immediate throw-in violation. Don't wait for the 5-second count. The NFHS issued an interp on this a few years ago. I'm sure it's in the "archive" thread.
Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 12:04pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.
Sort of.
A1 steps towards out of bounds but doesn't quite make it before throwing to A2. The only way I'm not calling this immediately is if A2 is on his way OOB or stationary. And if he's stationary, his next move determines whether I call it. If he's at all heading "the other way" it's an immediate violation.

You should never get to 5 (unless you were already at 4).
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 12:43pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.
Pretty sure you're wrong. I tried to tell you that the NFHS issued an interp specifically on this situation. Here it is:

1997 Interpretations:

Quote:
SITUATION #4: Thrower A1 inadvertently steps through the plane of the boundary line and touches the court inbounds. A1 immediately steps back into normal out-of-bounds, throw-in position. The contact with the court was during a situation: (a) with or (b) without defensive pressure on the throw-in team. RULING: A violation in both (a) and (b). (9-2-5) COMMENT: Whether or not there was defensive pressure or whether or not stepping on the court was inadvertent, it is a violation and no judgment is required in making the call.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 01:24pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
Pretty sure you're wrong. I tried to tell you that the NFHS issued an interp specifically on this situation. Here it is:

1997 Interpretations:
That interpretation is now case book play 9.2.5SitA. Has been for a few years.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BC Violation Refsmitty Basketball 15 Fri Jan 23, 2009 09:24am
Backcourt violation - 3 second violation Shades of Gray Basketball 15 Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:38pm
Throw-in violation or OOB violation? Nevadaref Basketball 47 Fri Nov 02, 2007 07:15pm
Clever? or a violation ,trying 2 avoid a violation hardwdref Basketball 3 Sat Nov 13, 2004 04:17pm
FT Violation jshock Basketball 13 Sun Nov 18, 2001 10:20pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1