Violation?

[SNIPERBBB]

You would probably then end up with a 5-second violation if the players don't recognize what happens and goes back to make a proper throw-in.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by grunewar

You would probably then end up with a 5-second violation if the players don't recognize what happens and goes back to make a proper throw-in.

This is an immediate throw-in violation. Don't wait for the 5-second count. The NFHS issued an interp on this a few years ago. I'm sure it's in the "archive" thread.

[SNIPERBBB]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

This is an immediate throw-in violation. Don't wait for the 5-second count. The NFHS issued an interp on this a few years ago. I'm sure it's in the "archive" thread.

Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.

Sort of.
A1 steps towards out of bounds but doesn't quite make it before throwing to A2. The only way I'm not calling this immediately is if A2 is on his way OOB or stationary. And if he's stationary, his next move determines whether I call it. If he's at all heading "the other way" it's an immediate violation.

You should never get to 5 (unless you were already at 4).

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.

Pretty sure you're wrong. I tried to tell you that the NFHS issued an interp specifically on this situation. Here it is:

1997 Interpretations:

SITUATION #4: Thrower A1 inadvertently steps through the plane of the boundary line and touches the court inbounds. A1 immediately steps back into normal out-of-bounds, throw-in position. The contact with the court was during a situation: (a) with or (b) without defensive pressure on the throw-in team. RULING: A violation in both (a) and (b). (9-2-5) COMMENT: Whether or not there was defensive pressure or whether or not stepping on the court was inadvertent, it is a violation and no judgment is required in making the call.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Pretty sure you're wrong. I tried to tell you that the NFHS issued an interp specifically on this situation. Here it is:

1997 Interpretations:

That interpretation is now case book play 9.2.5SitA. Has been for a few years.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Pretty sure its only an immediate violation if it becomes apparent that they will not be making the throw-in.

I'm pretty sure that you're wrong as per case book play 9.2.5SitA. It's the exact same play.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

You would probably then end up with a 5-second violation if the players don't recognize what happens and goes back to make a proper throw-in.

No, you should call an immediate violation as per case book 9.2.2SitC.