Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
My understanding what that the technical was for the preceding act of apparent deception for his team to get the throw-in. I actually have a problem with this theory.
|
JAR, see post #6. There was
NO technical foul called before the made shot for an apparent deception to get an unwarranted throw-in. If someone wants to call a "T" for that
AFTER the made shot, fine. You do have rules backing to do so. What there is absolutely
NO rules backing for though is for anyone to retoactively call an unsporting "T" and then go back and void either the throw-in or the made 3-pointer. You can't retroactively make a ball that was legally live dead, as Camron is trying to claim(I think).
Tue Jan 11, 2011, 03:21pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
