DQ Procedure

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Why would you?

Because in 2-man, the NFHS Officials Manual requires the non-calling official to notify the coach and the player.

[constable]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Because in 2-man, the NFHS Officials Manual requires the non-calling official to notify the coach and the player.

Had this discussion today at our Christmas meeting. The executive stated that if it's an obvious DQ and it's not a close game and the coach is already getting ready to sub his player not to waste time by not having non-calling official come over and do the notification. This is especially helpful if your association is ignoring the FED mechanic and still switches on every foul.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by constable

Had this discussion today at our Christmas meeting. The executive stated that if it's an obvious DQ and it's not a close game and the coach is already getting ready to sub his player not to waste time by not having non-calling official come over and do the notification. This is especially helpful if your association is ignoring the FED mechanic and still switches on every foul.

Sounds like they're just asking for trouble here.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Sounds like they're just asking for trouble here.

Like what?

My pregame usually includes "if a team is fouling at the end of the game to stop the clock, and everyone knows it, just stay there and deal with it. If there's any controversy, go away and let someone else handle the DQ."

Of course, I did have a T in this situation earlier this year.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Like what?

My pregame usually includes "if a team is fouling at the end of the game to stop the clock, and everyone knows it, just stay there and deal with it. If there's any controversy, go away and let someone else handle the DQ."

Of course, I did have a T in this situation earlier this year.

I misread; I read it that they were skipping the notification entirely.

[constable]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Sounds like they're just asking for trouble here.

In Ontario the Provincial Association decided last year to ignore the FED mechanic change that happened last year and to switch on every foul and the trail on FT is opposite- just like it used to be prior to 2009.

Does that make more sense?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by constable

In Ontario the Provincial Association decided last year to ignore the FED mechanic change that happened last year and to switch on every foul and the trail on FT is opposite- just like it used to be prior to 2009.

Does that make more sense?

Yes, but it has nothing to do with how I misread your post.

[constable]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Yes, but it has nothing to do with how I misread your post.

I know. I gotta get better at reading the entire thread. I'm pretty quick to hit reply when I see something directed at me,

cheers