DQ Procedure

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Sounds like they're just asking for trouble here.

Like what?

My pregame usually includes "if a team is fouling at the end of the game to stop the clock, and everyone knows it, just stay there and deal with it. If there's any controversy, go away and let someone else handle the DQ."

Of course, I did have a T in this situation earlier this year.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Like what?

My pregame usually includes "if a team is fouling at the end of the game to stop the clock, and everyone knows it, just stay there and deal with it. If there's any controversy, go away and let someone else handle the DQ."

Of course, I did have a T in this situation earlier this year.

I misread; I read it that they were skipping the notification entirely.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Just want to confirm that the word "not" is modifying the word "timeout". RichMSN is correct. Do not treat this like a timeout. There are important differences in terms of allowing substitutions during this time interval. The "warning" horn has a different meaning here.

It's modifying "free" and "timeout". Coaches can call the players over, but on the first horn, I'm in the huddle telling the coach I need a sub NOW. That usually means I'm right in there, since notifying the player usually takes about 5 seconds. The coach doesn't want that second horn going off before a player is at the table. That's the key difference, to me -- I will give a little leeway on timeouts because we have the resumption of play procedure if I need it.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Just want to confirm that the word "not" is modifying the word "timeout". RichMSN is correct. Do not treat this like a timeout. There are important differences in terms of allowing substitutions during this time interval. The "warning" horn has a different meaning here.

An 'interval of time' is how my past interpreter put it.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

An 'interval of time' is how my past interpreter put it.

Was his redundancy deliberate?

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Was his redundancy deliberate?

Would you repeat the question?

[M&M Guy]

Why do I keep getting dragged into these things?

Oh, wait, never mind.

[constable]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Sounds like they're just asking for trouble here.

In Ontario the Provincial Association decided last year to ignore the FED mechanic change that happened last year and to switch on every foul and the trail on FT is opposite- just like it used to be prior to 2009.

Does that make more sense?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by constable

In Ontario the Provincial Association decided last year to ignore the FED mechanic change that happened last year and to switch on every foul and the trail on FT is opposite- just like it used to be prior to 2009.

Does that make more sense?

Yes, but it has nothing to do with how I misread your post.

[constable]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Yes, but it has nothing to do with how I misread your post.

I know. I gotta get better at reading the entire thread. I'm pretty quick to hit reply when I see something directed at me,

cheers