Double time-out

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The only thing I'd do differently is grant the TOs consecutively rather than concurrently. Seems to me if you're going to force them both to burn one, you should have two total TOs.

Though not the case with two injured, or bleeding, opponents who wish to remain in the game at the expense of two timeouts.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Though not the case with two injured, or bleeding, opponents who wish to remain in the game at the expense of two timeouts.

True, but that's another change I would make. I see no reason not to make them consecutive; especially with the OP.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I see no reason not to make them consecutive; especially with the OP.

Sigh......



Rookies.....

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Sigh......



Rookies.....

What was I thinking?

[just another ref]

This reminds me of another case which we won't even mention. Sure, it tells us what to do if indeed the requests were made at "the exact same time." But what are the odds of that? Furthermore, it doesn't say the two officials cannot confer. (neither does the other case we won't mention)

"My guy requested time out as the ball came out of the net."

"I didn't see the request until it was bouncing on the floor."

tweet

"Time out A."

[Adam]

Originally Posted by just another ref

This reminds me of another case which we won't even mention. Sure, it tells us what to do if indeed the requests were made at "the exact same time." But what are the odds of that? Furthermore, it doesn't say the two officials cannot confer. (neither does the other case we won't mention)

"My guy requested time out as the ball came out of the net."

"I didn't see the request until it was bouncing on the floor."

tweet

"Time out A."

Problem is, in spite of your protestations to the contrary, the case play to which you refer doesn't give the option of a conference. This case play does not prohibit it, however. In fact, proper application would pretty much require it.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Problem is, in spite of your protestations to the contrary, the case play to which you refer doesn't give the option of a conference.

Communication is always an option.