|
|||
This reminds me of another case which we won't even mention. Sure, it tells us what to do if indeed the requests were made at "the exact same time." But what are the odds of that? Furthermore, it doesn't say the two officials cannot confer. (neither does the other case we won't mention)
"My guy requested time out as the ball came out of the net." "I didn't see the request until it was bouncing on the floor." tweet "Time out A."
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Communication is always an option.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
||||
You're the only one who claims the case play in question doesn't say what it says; which is that once the two officials communicate their opposing preliminary signals, all further communication is relegated to determining how "point of interruption" applies to the particular situation.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
These are facts of the case. They are undisputed.* *A Few Good Men was on TNT over the weekend. "You can't handle the truth!"
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
As I stated in the OP, if they were called at the same time, each time would lose a time out as soon as it was granted, however if there was some lag time between the requests then would there be two separate time outs.
__________________
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates"--Earvin "Magic" Johnson |
|
||||
Quote:
I'm still not sure what you think the case play refers to. Do you think it's in place for obstinant officials? Do you think it's in place for the once in a million call where two officials actually report their fouls without knowledge of the other? Is there another option? It's not like you're arguing whether it's a good rule/policy; you're arguing the actual rule itself. I'm not even that obstinant.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
4-19-8. As I read it, it is virtually impossible for a play to happen which would result in this godforsaken case play.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Double Foul and Double Technical | routhless | Basketball | 10 | Sat Jan 30, 2010 09:53am |
Long Time Lurker, First Time Poster | SoInZebra | Basketball | 122 | Mon Mar 26, 2007 04:10pm |
PSK --- Double fouls --- One more time | STEVED21 | Football | 53 | Mon Sep 01, 2003 10:00am |
double or false double | mick | Basketball | 10 | Thu Feb 06, 2003 10:34pm |
Double Whistle:Time Out or Foul? | blacktiger | Basketball | 6 | Wed Jan 03, 2001 09:47am |