When a block is a foul

[Scratch85]

4-27-3 . . . contact which does not hinder the opponent from participating in normal . . . offensive movement should be considered incidental.

IMO, a player who is in a good defensive position and first makes a clean block will be allowed a wider range of incidental contact than a player who comes recklessly from a bad defensive position and makes contact following a clean block.

[justacoach]

Originally Posted by Scratch85

4-27-3 . . . contact which does not hinder the opponent from participating in normal . . . offensive movement should be considered incidental.

IMO, a player who is in a good defensive position and first makes a clean block will be allowed a wider range of incidental contact than a player who comes recklessly from a bad defensive position and makes contact following a clean block.

Where is there support for your opinion in the rules cite you provide??
Are you consorting with the "spirit" as opposed to the essence of the rules?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by justacoach

Where is there support for your opinion in the rules cite you provide??

Look at the incidental contact rule in 4-27. If someone blocks your shot, not sure what normal offensive movement you then have.

Peace

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Look at the incidental contact rule in 4-27. If someone blocks your shot, not sure what normal offensive movement you then have.

Peace

The ability to either retrieve the ball or play defense.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The ability to either retrieve the ball or play defense.

The ability to play defense is "offensive movement"???

[Adam]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

The ability to play defense is "offensive movement"???

Nope, it would be "normal defensive movement." Oddly enough, you'll find it very close to the place the rule book mentions "normal offensive movement."