Watch Those Arms...

[bainsey]

By the NFHS rule set, we call that 10-6-4. A player cannot extend his arms (except vertically) that hinders an opponent's movement at the time of contact. It may not have been a hold in your case, but it sounds like illegal contact, at the very least.

[DLH17]

Originally Posted by bainsey

By the NFHS rule set, we call that 10-6-4. A player cannot extend his arms (except vertically) that hinders an opponent's movement at the time of contact. It may not have been a hold in your case, but it sounds like illegal contact, at the very least.

would this rule also be applicable to an offensive player dribbling the ball with non dribbling hand/arm extended (arm bar protecting space. arm does not extend outward, just protects)?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by DLH17

would this rule also be applicable to an offensive player dribbling the ball with non dribbling hand/arm extended (arm bar protecting space. arm does not extend outward, just protects)?

I'm confused, is the arm extended or not? If it's extended and is preventing the defense from reaching a spot they would normally be able to reach, it's a foul.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I'm confused, is the arm extended or not? If it's extended and is preventing the defense from reaching a spot they would normally be able to reach, it's a foul.

...provided there is contact. But I knew that's what you meant.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

...provided there is contact. But I knew that's what you meant.

If there's no contact, then nothing is "preventing" the defense from getting to the spot.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

If there's no contact, then nothing is "preventing" the defense from getting to the spot.

Ok, then we agree.

Should we hug now?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Ok, then we agree.

Should we hug now?

Get a room.

[DLH17]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I'm confused, is the arm extended or not? If it's extended and is preventing the defense from reaching a spot they would normally be able to reach, it's a foul.

apparently, i am too.

i'm envisioning a point guard dribbling hard right over the division line while being closely guarded by a defender. the guard is dribbling with their right hand. their off hand isn't hanging limply at their side. it's extended to some degree for balance if nothing else. does that help a little?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by DLH17

apparently, i am too.

i'm envisioning a point guard dribbling hard right over the division line while being closely guarded by a defender. the guard is dribbling with their right hand. their off hand isn't hanging limply at their side. it's extended to some degree for balance if nothing else. does that help a little?

IMO FWIW, it's judgment. She can't use it as an arm bar to keep the defense away. If she needs it for balance, she might want to take up chess club or debate team or something.
OTOH, if the defense sees the arm and just gives up ground, it's nothing.

[DLH17]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

IMO FWIW, it's judgment. She can't use it as an arm bar to keep the defense away. If she needs it for balance, she might want to take up chess club or debate team or something.
OTOH, if the defense sees the arm and just gives up ground, it's nothing.

lol...understood

i see this a lot in girls hoops (which is prolly why you used gender in your answer, no?)