WI coach suspended

[Rich]

I don't know the teams or the officials, but it's an interesting story nonetheless:

Heated Basketball Game Leads to Coach's Suspension - WBAY-TV Green Bay-Fox Cities-Northeast Wisconsin News:

Some short video there....I have no idea where the technical occurred in the original play, either.

[Anchor]

Was the player ejected? or DQ'ed for fouls accumulated?

I'm assuming the reporter got the semantics wrong. The ball was definitely alive and it was a contact foul, so it would be difficult to classify as a technical. Intentional, perhaps flagrant contact foul--maybe.

If the player was ejected it must have been ruled flagrant, which a guy sipping a cup of coffee while sitting comfortably at his keyboard in NC with no "feel" for the game really didn't perceive.

Interesting that it made the news.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

I don't know the teams or the officials, but it's an interesting story nonetheless:

Heated Basketball Game Leads to Coach's Suspension - WBAY-TV Green Bay-Fox Cities-Northeast Wisconsin News:

Some short video there....I have no idea where the technical occurred in the original play, either.

Rich, you guys in Wisconsin seem to have all the fun..........

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

I don't know the teams or the officials, but it's an interesting story nonetheless:

Heated Basketball Game Leads to Coach's Suspension - WBAY-TV Green Bay-Fox Cities-Northeast Wisconsin News:

Some short video there....I have no idea where the technical occurred in the original play, either.

Hard to tell from video, but it looks like an intentional.

[fullor30]

Rich,
Did you get my pm? Sent a few days ago with phone #

[Rich]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Rich,
Did you get my pm? Sent a few days ago with phone #

I didn't. Send it again.

[jdmara]

Wow...Looks pretty un-basketball-like play. I think you have to go with at least an intentional but flagrant was probably the correct call.

-Josh