Similar to Welpe's situation

[representing]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Didn't you indicate that the player bumped you before you reported the personal foul? If so, above in red is not correct.

And I don't have a clue how you came up with this.

What's wrong with blue? I would like your clarification please.

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by representing

What's wrong with blue? I would like your clarification please.

You state you would inbound the ball under the basket. Why?

[representing]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

You state you would inbound the ball under the basket. Why?

Flagrant and intentional fouls are at POI. Only technical fouls are at division line.

Edit: Read 7.5.4b and 7.5.6a

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by representing

Flagrant and intentional fouls are at POI. Only technical fouls are at division line.

Edit: Read 7.5.4b and 7.5.6a

Oh dear.

Edit: 7-5-4 b. has nothing to do with this play.

(And just as an FYI, the appropriate way to reference rules is with dashes, periods are for casebook plays. It helps keep everyone on the same page.)

[representing]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Oh dear.

Edit: 7-5-4 b. has nothing to do with this play.

(And just as an FYI, the appropriate way to reference rules is with dashes, periods are for casebook plays. It helps keep everyone on the same page.)

thanks for the fyi.

[tomegun]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Oh dear.

Thank you for the laugh.

Summary:

• Official is bumped after calling foul, but before reporting
• Foul was player's 5th
• Official does nothing
• Official posts situation on website
• Official gets responses, but doesn't receive them well
• Official says he handles situations even though he didn't
• Official posts what he would have done with glaring rules application errors
• Official admits errors in what he would have done, but not all errors
• (Hopefully) official takes every bit of advice given to include reading the rule book for comprehension