The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
He mentioned that the part in red was what he would have done then but now knows the err of his ways. The rest speaks for itself. One step forward, two steps back...
Ah, I see that now. Thanks. This thread is confusing me.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
What's wrong with blue? I would like your clarification please.
You state you would inbound the ball under the basket. Why?
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
You state you would inbound the ball under the basket. Why?
Flagrant and intentional fouls are at POI. Only technical fouls are at division line.

Edit: Read 7.5.4b and 7.5.6a
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:52pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
Didn't you indicate that the player bumped you before you reported the personal foul? If so, above in red is not correct.

And I don't have a clue how you came up with this.
Yes, it's laughably bad.

representing needs to step back and try to understand how many rules he's missed in this one scenario:

(1) It would be a flagrant technical foul. It's still a technical, so the throw-in is at the division line.

(2) Since the coach hadn't been notified of the player's 5th foul, he's not bench personnel at the time of the flagrant technical, so the coach does not receive an indirect technical foul.

We ran into a parent in the parking lot who seemed to be waiting for us. He was quite complimentary, even though his kid's team lost by 18 points -- he was amazed at how much "stress" we must be under. I actually laughed and said that I probably feel the least stress of anyone out there.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
Flagrant and intentional fouls are at POI. Only technical fouls are at division line.

Edit: Read 7.5.4b and 7.5.6a
Oh dear.

Edit: 7-5-4 b. has nothing to do with this play.

(And just as an FYI, the appropriate way to reference rules is with dashes, periods are for casebook plays. It helps keep everyone on the same page.)

Last edited by jdw3018; Wed Dec 23, 2009 at 12:56pm.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Yes, it's laughably bad.

representing needs to step back and try to understand how many rules he's missed in this one scenario:

(1) It would be a flagrant technical foul. It's still a technical, so the throw-in is at the division line.

(2) Since the coach hadn't been notified of the player's 5th foul, he's not bench personnel at the time of the flagrant technical, so the coach does not receive an indirect technical foul.

We ran into a parent in the parking lot who seemed to be waiting for us. He was quite complimentary, even though his kid's team lost by 18 points -- he was amazed at how much "stress" we must be under. I actually laughed and said that I probably feel the least stress of anyone out there.
Oh, really? I thought Flagrant technical and personal fouls were all still under the classification of Flagrant, which would put the ball at POI. Thanks for correcting me. But I can't find anything in the book about the difference between flagrant personal and flagrant technical.

EDIT: I said I was wrong about number 2 in my post about the situation. YOU should read everything, so you wouldn't make a statement like that.

Last edited by representing; Wed Dec 23, 2009 at 12:59pm.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
Oh dear.

Edit: 7-5-4 b. has nothing to do with this play.

(And just as an FYI, the appropriate way to reference rules is with dashes, periods are for casebook plays. It helps keep everyone on the same page.)
thanks for the fyi.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:59pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
oh, really? I thought flagrant technical and personal fouls were all still under the classification of flagrant, which would put the ball at poi. Thanks for correcting me. But i can't find anything in the book about the difference between flagrant personal and flagrant technical.
4-19-4
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:59pm
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
Oh dear.
Thank you for the laugh.

Summary:
  • Official is bumped after calling foul, but before reporting
  • Foul was player's 5th
  • Official does nothing
  • Official posts situation on website
  • Official gets responses, but doesn't receive them well
  • Official says he handles situations even though he didn't
  • Official posts what he would have done with glaring rules application errors
  • Official admits errors in what he would have done, but not all errors
  • (Hopefully) official takes every bit of advice given to include reading the rule book for comprehension
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
Oh, really? I thought Flagrant technical and personal fouls were all still under the classification of Flagrant, which would put the ball at POI. Thanks for correcting me. But I can't find anything in the book about the difference between flagrant personal and flagrant technical.

EDIT: I said I was wrong about number 2 in my post about the situation. YOU should read everything, so you wouldn't make a statement like that.
Any type of technical foul is a technical foul for administration purposes. It means that any player may attempt the free throws, and the ball is put into play at the division line.

A flagrant foul is simply a special type of a personal foul or technical foul. You'll note in 7.5.4 b. that it references a flagrant personal foul only.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
4-19-4
So it would be flagrant technical because the contact occurred during dead-ball. I got it now. Thanks TJ.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 01:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
Any type of technical foul is a technical foul for administration purposes. It means that any player may attempt the free throws, and the ball is put into play at the division line.

A flagrant foul is simply a special type of a personal foul or technical foul. You'll note in 7.5.4 b. that it references a flagrant personal foul only.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston area
Posts: 615
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
So it would be flagrant technical because the contact occurred during dead-ball. I got it now. Thanks TJ.
I feel like I am piling on. But...no...contact between a player and an official is not "live ball contact" the way you are suggesting. It does not matter if the ball is live or dead...if a player intentionally contacts an official, it is a technical foul (10-3-7a) and in your situation, I would also deem it a flagrant foul.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 01:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayStateRef View Post
I feel like I am piling on. But...no...contact between a player and an official is not "live ball contact" the way you are suggesting. It does not matter if the ball is live or dead...if a player intentionally contacts an official, it is a technical foul (10-3-7a) and in your situation, I would also deem it a flagrant foul.
Actually it is 10-3-6a what you're talking about, but thanks for the reference.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 03:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
Oh, really? I thought Flagrant technical and personal fouls were all still under the classification of Flagrant, which would put the ball at POI. Thanks for correcting me. But I can't find anything in the book about the difference between flagrant personal and flagrant technical.
All fouls are either Personal or Technical.

They *might* also have an additional qualifer -- common, flagrant, intentional, double, etc.

The penalty for a single T includes a throw-in at the division line. IF there's a throw-in for a P, it's near the spot of the foul.

And, there's no POI for any single foul, flagrant or not.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6.4.1 situation f Rita C Basketball 13 Sun Feb 15, 2009 07:11pm
Is there a Coaching forum similar to this? dsqrddgd909 Basketball 9 Sun Jan 25, 2009 02:56pm
A situation I had TussAgee11 Baseball 18 Sat Feb 04, 2006 07:09pm
OOB situation IURef Basketball 6 Thu Mar 04, 2004 05:46pm
Another .3 second situation williebfree Basketball 11 Sun Dec 22, 2002 09:06pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1