The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 12:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
From a thread from two months ago:

I go back to before the alternating possession arrow, when we had jump balls to start each period, for each held ball situation, and even for closely guarded situations, at three different circles on the court, with a lot of different players involved. Back then, because we had so many jump balls, coaches actually had jump ball plays, depending on which circle, and the probability of winning, or losing the tap. These coaches knew the various rules regarding jump balls, and taught these rules to their players. Officials, again, because there were so many jump balls, knew all the jump ball rules like the back of their hand, and good officials actually spent time practicing tosses by tossing the ball up through a basket from below, usually before preseason scrimmages. Now that we have only one jump ball a game, plus overtimes, coaches don't really know the rules, and since they don't know the rules, their players don't know the rules. It’s the same with officials. Now that we have only one jump ball a game, plus overtimes, officials, myself included, don't know the various jump ball rules as well now as we did before the advent of alternating possessions. And these rules aren't easy to understand, especially when you have to apply them in a split second, and only get the opportunity to apply them a few dozen times each season, half the time as the tosser, and the other half of the time as the official observing the jump ball. Jumpers, players on the circle, players off the circle. Official ready to toss, official tosses, ball is tapped. Open spots on the circle, filled spots on the circle. Moving onto the circle, moving off of the circle. Today, it seems like the two tallest kids get to jump, a few shorter kids match up on the circle, and a few more match up off the circle. The official throws up the toss, not with the same skill that I saw many years ago, and the other official stands back and hopes that nothing "odd", or "weird", happens, that is, "odd enough”, or "weird enough”, to be immediately recognized as a violation. Over the past 100 years, we’ve gone from jump balls after every basket; to jump balls to start each period, for each held ball situation, and for closely guarded situations, at three different circles on the court; to a single jump ball at the center circle to start the game, plus overtimes, with alternating possessions after that. I think that the next logical progression is to start the game with a coin toss, like they do in soccer, football, and probably a few other sports. Or let the visitors get to go on offense first, like in baseball, or softball.
Well I disagree with your logic. I don't find the jump ball rules that hard to digest and understand. We typically have a jump ball every game, so these rules should be thought about every game and will be fresh. Now the correctable error rule, which we rarely ever have to actually implement, is infintely more complicated in my opinion. Jump ball rules are simple compared to correctable errors.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 12:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 439
I remember quite some time ago I did a pre-season G tournament in Iowa where they experimented with the shot clock. It worked well, but we did have some issues with the personnel running the clock at times. There would be a rather big learning curve for officials and the table getting started. Can't say I remember what ever came of it. Anyone from Iowa have anything?
__________________
"The soldier is the army."

-General George S. Patton, Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 12:17pm
MABO Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MB, Canada
Posts: 796
It's interesting to read all of the posts and desired changes in this thread. Most I think mirror in concept what FIBA rules enforces.

So if I had to be King for a day I would liek to have all levels of basketball in every part of the world play with the same rules set, (i really don't care which one), just get some uniformity and don't make any modifications to them.
__________________
"Your Azz is the Red Sea, My foot is Moses, and I am about to part the Red Sea all the way up to my knee!"

All references/comments are intended for educational purposes. Opinions are free.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 12:28pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Thumbs up

I think all games should be 8 minute quarters running clock, teams should have no timeouts, games can end in a tie after regulation, possession after a jump ball should be determined by the two players involved arm wrestling, dunking allowed only in girls games and no intentional or flagrant foul calls - let 'em get as violent as they want.

Most important - coaches must remain seated - IN THE PARKING LOT!
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 12:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeEater View Post
It's interesting to read all of the posts and desired changes in this thread. Most I think mirror in concept what FIBA rules enforces.

So if I had to be King for a day I would liek to have all levels of basketball in every part of the world play with the same rules set, (i really don't care which one), just get some uniformity and don't make any modifications to them.
If I could change one FIBA rule it would be getting away from their dumb numbers system. Considering they are much more relaxed on a number of uniform issues, it seems laughable that they only permit 4-15
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 12:51pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeEater View Post
It's interesting to read all of the posts and desired changes in this thread. Most I think mirror in concept what FIBA rules enforces.

So if I had to be King for a day I would liek to have all levels of basketball in every part of the world play with the same rules set, (i really don't care which one), just get some uniformity and don't make any modifications to them.
I've only seen one that mirrored FIBA, Rich's "get rid of live ball timeouts." Nothing else has gone that way.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:09pm
MABO Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MB, Canada
Posts: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
I've only seen one that mirrored FIBA, Rich's "get rid of live ball timeouts." Nothing else has gone that way.
When I posted that reply I saw the posts about correctable errors and also entering the lane on Free throws which are the way FIBA is now. Or at least some resemblence to this.
__________________
"Your Azz is the Red Sea, My foot is Moses, and I am about to part the Red Sea all the way up to my knee!"

All references/comments are intended for educational purposes. Opinions are free.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:15pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeEater View Post
When I posted that reply I saw the posts about correctable errors and also entering the lane on Free throws which are the way FIBA is now. Or at least some resemblence to this.
Ah, I'd forgotten about the FT thing, and didn't know FIBA had that rule on CE.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:16pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Ditto

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Coaches can only request timeout during a dead ball (including after a made basket, when we can spare a moment to glance.) All live ball TO's must be requested by a player on the team in control.
That would at least convey some of the responsibility for communication to the coach and the players where it belongs, rather than saddling the officials, in the heat of the moment with their eyes on the action, with the expectation that they hear, confirm, and acknowledge every request that's given or else they're trying to somehow shaft the team. Just last week I was accused with the words, "There, are you happy? You cost us a possession because you didn't give me a timeout when I asked for it!" (There was no player control at the time).

I've been asking coaches lately to make their TO requests somehow multisyllabic. Like "How 'bout a 60 second timeout here!" Or "We'd like a timeout." Or, "We have possession, how 'bout a timeout." When they stand there and just yell "Time!", that one word request gets lost in all the other terse orders they're barking continuously to their teams all game long. The jury is still out on the experiment.

Just make it easy...only players on the floor may request a timeout. Let the coaches teach their players to keep an eye on them instead of us. Used to be that way back when I started in the late '70's, if I remember right.

Last edited by Freddy; Wed Dec 16, 2009 at 01:19pm.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by constable View Post
OH YA- shot clocks. Shot clocks make for such a better game. In going from FIBA with a 24 second shot clock to Fed with an 4 8 minute shot clocks, it is such a better game.

So if I could change only one rule, it would be the implementation of shot clocks for all high school and up games.
  • I agree, a 48 minute shot clock would be ideal. (I know, I know, he was being sarcastic about 4 x 8 minute quarters.) But schools are in $$ trouble already. Install shot clocks AND find decent operators? Hold on that please....

  • FT lane restrictions end on release.

  • If the opposing coach yells "I want a time out next time we have the ball" to the official while he runs past the coach, while my player is on a fast break, that causes an inadvertant whistle stopping my break, he gets a T for unsporting.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachP View Post
If the opposing coach yells "I want a time out next time we have the ball" to the official while he runs past the coach, while my player is on a fast break, that causes an inadvertant whistle stopping my break, he gets a T for unsporting.
How often does this ever happen in a Varsity game? This is silly.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by j51969 View Post
Jokes aside. If you could make "one" change to the game either a rule, or something else concerning timing (whatever your the king). Maybe even goning back to a previous rule. I personnally would like two halfs instead of quarters. I think that some states do that now(east coast?). What do you think?
MN does halves. It's great.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
How often does this ever happen in a Varsity game? This is silly.
Last night...except for the T part....
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachP View Post
Last night...except for the T part....
You must have had a moron for an official then. What coach in his right mind would call a timeout while his team has a fast break? Knowing this, any reputable varsity official would think to look and make sure the correct coach actually requested a timeout. I assume this was the new trail as the new lead would have been closer to you at the time?
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 02:04pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbcof83 View Post
MN does halves. It's great.
So did the game fees go up when you were forced to work 4:00 more per game?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
King James Larks Basketball 5 Sat May 03, 2008 09:48am
The King is gone gsf23 Softball 8 Wed Feb 14, 2007 04:16pm
The KING is coming! JEL Softball 7 Wed Mar 30, 2005 09:43am
The King and His Court SC Ump Softball 13 Sun Oct 31, 2004 05:52am
It's good to be the King. Mark Padgett Basketball 6 Mon Feb 17, 2003 07:40am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1