The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:13am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
I don't think the halves verses quarters issue is all that important either way. While I'd like to see the change, there are others I'd prefer to see if I had to choose.

My number one desired change: Coaches can only request timeout during a dead ball (including after a made basket, when we can spare a moment to glance.) All live ball TO's must be requested by a player on the team in control.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:18am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 15,051
Correctable error/failure to award merited free throws

If a team who did not receive merited free throws scores a field goal before the error is noticed then the correctable period will be deemed to have expired and free throws cannot now be awarded.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 862
I'd like to see NFHS mirror the NCAA and allow players into the lane on the release of a free throw, rather than waiting for the rim.

Is that actually in the NCAA rules? Or is that one of those things that nobody enforces?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:24am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas2456 View Post
I'd like to see NFHS mirror the NCAA and allow players into the lane on the release of a free throw, rather than waiting for the rim.

Is that actually in the NCAA rules? Or is that one of those things that nobody enforces?
It's in the rules; just like it was in the NFHS rules way back when I played (ca. 1990). The restrictions end on the release; except for the players not along the lane and the shooter, for whom the restrictions end when the ball hits either the backboard or the rim.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: midwest/plains
Posts: 402
I personally think the players in the lane on the release is LESS rough than on the rim, and now with the players up a spot should be revisited.

I will never understand what people have against quarters in high school basketball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 11:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reffing Rev. View Post
I personally think the players in the lane on the release is LESS rough than on the rim, and now with the players up a spot should be revisited.

I will never understand what people have against quarters in high school basketball.
It's not a huge deal. I think it would add to the natural flow of the game. The coaches have plenty of time-outs to adjust to things as needed. Does anyone currently have that in place in there state? If so, what are your opinions?
__________________
"The soldier is the army."

-General George S. Patton, Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:33am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 15,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas2456 View Post
I'd like to see NFHS mirror the NCAA and allow players into the lane on the release of a free throw, rather than waiting for the rim.

Is that actually in the NCAA rules? Or is that one of those things that nobody enforces?
Section 1. Free Throw

Art. 2. After the ball is placed at the disposal of a free-thrower:
...
d. The free-thrower shall not enter the semicircle. The free-thrower shall not leave the semicircle before the try contacts the ring, backboard or when the free throw ends.
e. No player shall enter or leave a marked lane space or contact any part of the court outside the marked lane space until the free-thrower has released the ball.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
I don't think the halves verses quarters issue is all that important either way. While I'd like to see the change, there are others I'd prefer to see if I had to choose.

My number one desired change: Coaches can only request timeout during a dead ball (including after a made basket, when we can spare a moment to glance.) All live ball TO's must be requested by a player on the team in control.

What was the reasoning behind changing this? I don't really like that ascept of it either. It is also changed in football. Can the players not be trusted to call the timeout at the proper time? If not, how will they learn?

To the OP,
I am not big fan of the huddle/high five @ the free throw line after a FTA.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 16, 2009, 01:16pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Ditto

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Coaches can only request timeout during a dead ball (including after a made basket, when we can spare a moment to glance.) All live ball TO's must be requested by a player on the team in control.
That would at least convey some of the responsibility for communication to the coach and the players where it belongs, rather than saddling the officials, in the heat of the moment with their eyes on the action, with the expectation that they hear, confirm, and acknowledge every request that's given or else they're trying to somehow shaft the team. Just last week I was accused with the words, "There, are you happy? You cost us a possession because you didn't give me a timeout when I asked for it!" (There was no player control at the time).

I've been asking coaches lately to make their TO requests somehow multisyllabic. Like "How 'bout a 60 second timeout here!" Or "We'd like a timeout." Or, "We have possession, how 'bout a timeout." When they stand there and just yell "Time!", that one word request gets lost in all the other terse orders they're barking continuously to their teams all game long. The jury is still out on the experiment.

Just make it easy...only players on the floor may request a timeout. Let the coaches teach their players to keep an eye on them instead of us. Used to be that way back when I started in the late '70's, if I remember right.

Last edited by Freddy; Wed Dec 16, 2009 at 01:19pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
King James Larks Basketball 5 Sat May 03, 2008 09:48am
The King is gone gsf23 Softball 8 Wed Feb 14, 2007 04:16pm
The KING is coming! JEL Softball 7 Wed Mar 30, 2005 09:43am
The King and His Court SC Ump Softball 13 Sun Oct 31, 2004 05:52am
It's good to be the King. Mark Padgett Basketball 6 Mon Feb 17, 2003 07:40am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1