The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:04pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Question You make the FT call - for newbies

Newbies - although this doesn't come up a lot, when it does, you're expected to make an immediate ruling. What is the ruling when a double violation (violation by both the non-shooting then shooting teams) occurs in the following free throw situations:

A) first shot of a one-and-one

B) a one shot only situation

C) first shot of a two shot situation (same as first or second shot of a three shot situation)

D) last shot in any two or three shot situation
__________________
Yom HaShoah

Last edited by Mark Padgett; Fri Feb 27, 2009 at 06:34pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
What's the score and how much time is left?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
A) AP
B) AP
C) Wipe off the first shot, shoot the second (Edit: I'm thinking it matters which team violated first)
D) AP

By the way, you had two "B's" in there.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
ZM1283: I think he needs to give more information about the double violation to get a correct book answer.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett View Post
Newbies - although this doesn't come up a lot, when it does, you're expected to make an immediate ruling. What is the ruling when a double violation (violation by both the non-shooting then shooting teams) occurs in the following free throw situations:

A) first shot of a one-and-one

B) a one shot only situation

B) first shot of a two shot situation (same as first or second shot of a three shot situation)

C) last shot in any two or three shot situation
A) Count it if good, re-shoot if not
B) Same as A
C) Same as A
D) Same as A

However, this changes if the violator from offense is the shooter or someone behind the FT line extended behind the arc.

If shooter violates or offense behind FT line extended & behind arc then see zm1283's first answer.

This assumes Mark actually intending to say THEN in his original situation.

Last edited by WreckRef; Fri Feb 27, 2009 at 06:35pm.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch85 View Post
ZM1283: I think he needs to give more information about the double violation to get a correct book answer.
I'm thinking the same thing...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Okay lets try again....

A) If the offense violates first, wouldn't you hit the whistle and wipe it off immediately? If defense violates first, then offense, go to the arrow.

B) Same as A

C) If the offense violates first, wipe it off immediately. Same if the defense violates first. Shoot the second FT as normal.

D) AP if defense violates followed by offense. If offense is first, wipe it off. Throw-in for the other team at the spot nearest the violation on the end line.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 06:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
I assume he menat "simultaneous" violation, not "double violation". So, both teams violated at teh same time -- and it doesn't matter whether both were on the lane, or one (or both) was off the lane.

If it's one team followed by another, the resulting action might be the same as the simultaneous violation, but it's not a simultaneous violation.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 07:42pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Assume that if you're calling both violations, you are not ignoring the other. Rule accordingly.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 07:43pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch85 View Post
ZM1283: I think he needs to give more information about the double violation to get a correct book answer.
Why?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 27, 2009, 11:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch85 View Post
ZM1283: I think he needs to give more information about the double violation to get a correct book answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Why?
Because I don't have any idea what a double violation during a FT situation might be. As Bob mentions, he may mean a simultaneous violation. Since most of us know that Padgett may lead us down a wandering path (sometimes for entertainment and sometimes for knowledge) from time to time, I am just waiting for his answer.

I take that back, I have an idea what someone might refer to as a double violation but since there are a few variations of that, some may be penalized as a simultaneous violation and therefore, I am not sure how to address a "double violation." Assuming a double violation is as described in the OP, WreckRef has pretty good answer.

Last edited by Scratch85; Sat Feb 28, 2009 at 12:26am.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 28, 2009, 01:30am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
If you have WreckRef's scenario, then you don't have a simultaneous violation; you only have one as the 2nd is ignored.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 28, 2009, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
If you have WreckRef's scenario, then you don't have a simultaneous violation; you only have one as the 2nd is ignored.
WreckRef has a caveat. If . . . see ZM1283.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 28, 2009, 12:36pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch85 View Post
WreckRef has a caveat. If . . . see ZM1283.
True enough.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yet another you make the call for newbies Mark Padgett Basketball 6 Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:38pm
You make the call - newbies especially invited to participate Mark Padgett Basketball 29 Tue Feb 03, 2009 02:58pm
Another you make the call for newbies Mark Padgett Basketball 5 Tue Feb 03, 2009 01:51pm
Another you make the call for newbies Mark Padgett Basketball 7 Sat Jan 31, 2009 08:36am
Two "you make the call" situations for newbies Mark Padgett Basketball 8 Wed Jan 28, 2009 07:27pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1