Ruling

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Chewing the fat after pregame last night and one of the crew came up with this sitch.

A1 shooting free throw, we have a lane violation on B2 which prompts a delayed call with extended fist. Prior to shooting, A coach is granted timeout. The logic is that the TO does not end the free throw attempt (even though the shooter will get a new ten (10) second count after the TO.

Upon resumption do you honor delayed violation call? Can't find any backup or casebook scenario. I said yes, as it would be similar to running endline priviledge that would apply after a timeout.

Thoughts?

fullor30:

Yes. The delayed dead violation stays in effect, even if B2 occupies a different position on the court after the TO or is subsituted for during the TO. I am certain that there has been either a Casebook Play or an Interpretation or both published in the past.

MTD, Sr.