The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
And I believe it fits that description. It may be a light strike, but it's a strike.
Disagree. The rule clearly states that to be a kick the player must intentionally strike the ball with the leg or foot. Leg strikes ball.

The ball "striking" or otherwise contacting the leg (lightly or otherwise) is not a kick, absent a ruling to the contrary from NFHS.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 01:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Disagree. The rule clearly states that to be a kick the player must intentionally strike the ball with the leg or foot. Leg strikes ball.

The ball "striking" or otherwise contacting the leg (lightly or otherwise) is not a kick, absent a ruling to the contrary from NFHS.
I've stated my opinion - a player intentionally holding the ball between his/her legs has struck the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 01:54pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
I've stated my opinion - a player intentionally holding the ball between his/her legs has struck the ball.
What would you have in my post #15 in this thread?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 151
I would suspect that additional replies will not change jwd's opinion, but I think there is insufficient detail in the OP to reasonably offer an interpretation. Possible scenarios:

1) loose ball and during scramble A1 secures the ball between his legs with his hands. Even though his hands are on the ball are you really going to call a kicking violation? I'm not.
2) similar to #1, A1 now takes his hands off the ball to signal for a TO; NOW you are going to call a kicking violation? That would be a tough sell in my opinion.
3) OK, how about A1 has the ball lodged between his legs during the scramble but is prevented from reaching his hands down to the ball because...........B1 is holding him? PF on B1 right?
4) Wait, how about this one............A1 is trying to secure the ball with his legs while laying on the floor and intentionally not use his hands? Yes, I could see that in this sitch, A1 would actually "intentionally strike" the ball in trying to secure the possession. In that case, I agree with jwd, kicking violation.

I am sure I missed a couple of other possibilities.............
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio, cincinnati
Posts: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
Possible scenarios:

1) loose ball and during scramble A1 secures the ball between his legs with his hands. Even though his hands are on the ball are you really going to call a kicking violation? I'm not.
have to see this one but if the player has hands on the ball they can control it that way, might not be a kick.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
2) similar to #1, A1 now takes his hands off the ball to signal for a TO; NOW you are going to call a kicking violation? That would be a tough sell in my opinion.
How is this a tough sell?
Player is not required to signal time out -they can say it.
By allowing the player to hold the ball with the legs - which is not control - and signal time out, if you grant it you have given them an advantage. Clearly a kick.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
3) OK, how about A1 has the ball lodged between his legs during the scramble but is prevented from reaching his hands down to the ball because...........B1 is holding him? PF on B1 right?
Which happened first? if the ball is between the players legs you may have a violation before you have a foul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
4) Wait, how about this one............A1 is trying to secure the ball with his legs while laying on the floor and intentionally not use his hands? Yes, I could see that in this sitch, A1 would actually "intentionally strike" the ball in trying to secure the possession. In that case, I agree with jwd, kicking violation.
Trying means intentional. so contact with the legs is would be a kick.

If you use your legs to try to control the ball it is a kick it isn't that hard.
__________________
New and improved: if it's new it's not improved; if it's improved it's not new.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wasilla Ak
Posts: 500
My sit. was A1 dives on a loose ball, he lands on it chest first and is unable to get it with his hands. Momenum rools him across the top of the ball causing it to come to rest between his leggs, with him now on the floor on his chest. What are you going to allow him to do to prevent the kick ball violation.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKOFL View Post
What are you going to allow him to do to prevent the kick ball violation.
Immediately release the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vermont
Posts: 93
Just an observation about all the situations saying the ball gets lodged between the legs. If im doing a game and a ball gets lodged in any part of a players body, I'm getting another ball to throw at it hoping to dislodge it.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 08:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
I'm going to....

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKOFL View Post
My sit. was A1 dives on a loose ball, he lands on it chest first and is unable to get it with his hands. Momenum rools him across the top of the ball causing it to come to rest between his leggs, with him now on the floor on his chest. What are you going to allow him to do to prevent the kick ball violation.
eject him for making a travesty of the game
__________________
my bad, my bad......or was it yours?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 11:42pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Lightbulb

This is another example of where the NCAA rules are clearer and better than NFHS rules, in my not-so-humble opinion. The game is not meant to be played (as I now put myself in the omnipotent position of the creator and all-knower of basketball) by intentionally contacting the ball with a leg, just like the game is not meant to be played by people laying or rolling around on the ground (wheelchairs excepted) - both clearly defined as illegal in NCAA, but legal (laying on the ground and causing a legally moving player to trip and go down) or ambiguous (leg vice not clearly equaling a kicking violation) in NFHS.

Self-righteous rant off.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 04:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Okay. So if a women squeezes a man between her legs, she's striking him?
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 04:36pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
Okay. So if a women squeezes a man between her legs, she's striking him?
If you're in Hackensack, it sure is!!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 27, 2009, 01:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
Okay. So if a women squeezes a man between her legs, she's striking him?
I am picturing someone gently holding a baby.....Is that person striking the baby????
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 27, 2009, 01:34am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
Okay. So if a women squeezes a man between her legs, she's striking him?
If he's lucky.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 27, 2009, 01:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wasilla Ak
Posts: 500
To have player control, one of the criteria is to be "holding" the ball. It does not say with the hands. Question? Can you "hold" the ball with your leggs?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Player Control and Team Control fouls MelbRef Basketball 15 Mon Dec 15, 2008 01:43pm
player control/team control hardwoodballers Basketball 56 Wed Aug 23, 2006 08:41am
Player control vs Team control foul QuebecRef87 Basketball 6 Wed Jan 26, 2005 07:42am
Player COntrol vs. Team Control tjksail Basketball 32 Mon Jan 10, 2005 02:38pm
Player Control Ref Daddy Basketball 7 Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:24pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1