Team Control Mechanic

[Adam]

Originally Posted by fiasco

I hear what you're saying, but we don't do the same for a PCF. Why the distinction?

We don't? I give the signal for a PC foul at the spot and at the table. Am I wrong?

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

We don't? I give the signal for a PC foul at the spot and at the table. Am I wrong?

JRut is arguing that you should give the foul type at the table as well as the TC signal.

I'm asking why that is not done for PC foul.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by fiasco

JRut is arguing that you should give the foul type at the table as well as the TC signal.

I'm asking why that is not done for PC foul.

That's what I get for only paying half-a$$ attention. I'll slowly back away now.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by fiasco

JRut is arguing that you should give the foul type at the table as well as the TC signal.

I'm asking why that is not done for PC foul.

TC can be a hold, block, or push. FED wants that signal (which was all that was done before the 'punch' came along) included in the mechanic. Probably b/c the call is off-ball they want everyone to know what occurred to cause the foul.

PC has always its own signal and everybody eyes are already on that play, no further signal needed.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

PC has always its own signal and everybody eyes are already on that play, no further signal needed.

That, and 95.25% of the time, PC fouls are pushes or charges (with 4% holding and .75% elbowing)