what is the official ruling

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

I definitely don't do that. My idea is more of a "When in doubt, it is a foul," on a hand check, while I lean much more toward "When it doubt, it is not a foul," in most other cases. As far as contact with both hands, while still not automatic,
(is there really such a thing?) I would say this makes the foul call much more likely. Twice as likely, if you think about it.

Wait a minute; you are not following the letter of the law. Shame on you.

Originally Posted by just another ref

If the defender uses the contact of the hand to measure the opponent, (yes, this is a theory, but one that I think has merit) and this contact, which is illegal according to 10-6-2, allows the defender to more easily maintain his defensive position, this could easily be considered a hindrance, could it not?

I think it could, but that is where you judgment comes into play. And all I am asking is for some judgment to still be at play and consider that rules like 4-27 still exist. Now if the NF wants to change that rule, then that is fine with me. I feel it is irresponsible to make a POE that is not supported by rule without changing the rule.

Peace