![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I definitely don't do that. My idea is more of a "When in doubt, it is a foul," on a hand check, while I lean much more toward "When it doubt, it is not a foul," in most other cases. As far as contact with both hands, while still not automatic, (is there really such a thing?) I would say this makes the foul call much more likely. Twice as likely, if you think about it. Quote:
If the defender uses the contact of the hand to measure the opponent, (yes, this is a theory, but one that I think has merit) and this contact, which is illegal according to 10-6-2, allows the defender to more easily maintain his defensive position, this could easily be considered a hindrance, could it not?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Your ruling? | mcrowder | Softball | 30 | Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:06am |
| Ruling Please | eventnyc | Football | 12 | Tue Dec 05, 2006 09:01am |
| Official Gear - ASA Official Pants | Dakota | Softball | 10 | Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:20am |
| help with ruling | joelevmas | Baseball | 4 | Sun Jun 27, 2004 11:11pm |
| High School Official vs NCAA /College Official | CLAY | Basketball | 22 | Sat Feb 22, 2003 11:29pm |