AP question

[Adam]

I know I'm missing something, but here's the scenario.
AP throwin for A.
Legal held ball between thrower and B1.
Who gets the ball?

Arrow switches when the throwin ends, which happens when ball is legally touched on the playing court. This tells me it should be B's ball, but the devil on my shoulder keeps telling me it should stay with A. What am I missing, 'cause if the devil on my shoulder is right, then that's a precedent I'd love to go forward with.

[wisref2]

that little devil on your shoulder is the coach of A. Ignore him.

SORRY - missed the part that the thrower still had the ball.

[Ref in PA]

6.4.5 says not to change the arrow and the subsequent throwin will be an AP throwin for A.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I know I'm missing something, but here's the scenario.
AP throwin for A.
Legal held ball between thrower and B1.
Who gets the ball?

Arrow switches when the throwin ends, which happens when ball is legally touched on the playing court. This tells me it should be B's ball, but the devil on my shoulder keeps telling me it should stay with A. What am I missing, 'cause if the devil on my shoulder is right, then that's a precedent I'd love to go forward with.

Quicky answer without consulting book. I say B gets it, as ball is legally touched in bounds and A happens to be out of bounds, therefore violation on A and B gets ball AND AP arrow.

This is of course a product of A sticking the ball across the inbounds plane enabling B to legally grab ball (as you mentioned). I await the high council's ruling.

[Grail]

The throw ends after the ball is touched in bounds, but not if the thrower never releases the ball. The throw in must be released directly into the court, thus since no release, no completed throw in. The arrow is pointing A's direction. They get the ball again for an AP throw in.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Ref in PA

6.4.5 says not to change the arrow and the subsequent throwin will be an AP throwin for A.

Case book paly 6.4.5SitB to be exact. It's the same play. Good catch.

[Adam]

I like it when the devil on my shoulder is correct. thanks.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Quicky answer without consulting book. I say B gets it, as ball is legally touched in bounds and A happens to be out of bounds, therefore violation on A and B gets ball AND AP arrow.

This is of course a product of A sticking the ball across the inbounds plane enabling B to legally grab ball (as you mentioned). I await the high council's ruling.

Full, your full of it........

7.6.4 SITUATION F: Thrower A1 inadvertently holds the ball through the end-line plane during a throw-in. B1 is able to get his/her hands on the ball and A1 cannot pull it back. RULING: There is no player or team control during a throw in, therefore a held ball is called, resulting in an alternating-possession throw-in. If the original throw-in is an alternating-possession throw-in, Team A still has the arrow following the held ball.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I like it when the devil on my shoulder is correct. thanks.

But if he's correct, he's not a devil! The devil only deals in half-truths.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I like it when the devil on my shoulder is correct. thanks.

What in the world are you doing with M&M Guy on your shoulder? That has GOT to result in some serious chiropractor time!!

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Full, your full of it........

7.6.4 SITUATION F: Thrower A1 inadvertently holds the ball through the end-line plane during a throw-in. B1 is able to get his/her hands on the ball and A1 cannot pull it back. RULING: There is no player or team control during a throw in, therefore a held ball is called, resulting in an alternating-possession throw-in. If the original throw-in is an alternating-possession throw-in, Team A still has the arrow following the held ball.

You're full of it too!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

But if he's correct, he's not a devil! The devil only deals in half-truths.

I only reported about half of what he said. The rest was pretty high praise for some ref named "Chuck."

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I only reported about half of what he said. The rest was pretty high praise for some ref named "Chuck."

...half-truth...high praise... chuck... way, way too easy...

[Adam]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

What in the world are you doing with M&M Guy on your shoulder? That has GOT to result in some serious chiropractor time!!

Word.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

...half-truth...high praise... chuck... way, way too easy...

You're right. I should have known which half was the truth.