rotation

[TD21]

I would have to agree with those who say rotate in this situation. JRut's argument is valid in the sense that he is saying there are 8 players on one side of the floor and if the lead were to rotate that would leave on official to referee those 8. Having said that, I believe the lead still needs to rotate. There are many what ifs in this situation, but I'd rather be strong side and ahead of any players that are coming strong side. We all know that the one thing that the players are all looking for is the ball. The players are going to go where the ball is or the side of the floor where the ball is. So why not get strong side before the players do? I do agree with JRut in the fact the cllege men's and women's is two different mechanic sets, but I disagree with his thoughts on the difference between college women's and highschool, especially high school girls. NF follows college womens very closely, so it would seem more realistic to follow their philosophy, which in this case would be, to rotate strong side. I can't think of a situation where the trail would have to retreat to referee a play that the lead shouldn't come across. Having said that we can always rotate back if we need to. I always want a to referee as lead from strong side.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by TD21

NF follows college womens very closely, so it would seem more realistic to follow their philosophy, which in this case would be, to rotate strong side. I can't think of a situation where the trail would have to retreat to referee a play that the lead shouldn't come across. Having said that we can always rotate back if we need to. I always want a to referee as lead from strong side.

CCA Women's approved mechanic that the NF does not use.

• Two hand reporting.
• No stop clock for out of bounds calls
• Not stopping to report a foul (walk and talk)
• Rotation philosophy (the language they both use is different)
• Last second shot coming only from the C
• Signal mechanic--"hit to the head" or "using the knee" or "hooking/wrap"
• Lead's coverage area extends to the sideline, and the Lead official has out of bounds coverage on the sideline
• Lead has 3 point attempt responsibility
• Counting the basket (2 fingers coming downward)
• No bird-dogging
• Team Control signal (used for both PC and TC Fouls)

Those are all that I can think of off the top of my head.

Peace

[TD21]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

CCA Women's approved mechanic that the NF does not use.

• Two hand reporting.
• No stop clock for out of bounds calls
• Not stopping to report a foul (walk and talk)
• Rotation philosophy (the language they both use is different)
• Last second shot coming only from the C
• Signal mechanic--"hit to the head" or "using the knee" or "hooking/wrap"
• Lead's coverage area extends to the sideline, and the Lead official has out of bounds coverage on the sideline
• Lead has 3 point attempt responsibility
• Counting the basket (2 fingers coming downward)
• No bird-dogging
• Team Control signal (used for both PC and TC Fouls)

Those are all that I can think of off the top of my head.

Peace

I was refering to the court coverages. Besides the fact the lead takes the three point shooter in the corner there are no real differences. I could name many of the same differences in the men's game from NF too, and I believe you referred to that as to where you were getting your philosophy for not rotating. We were talking about rotations not all the differences between the men's, women's and federation mechanics. Wording in "rotation philosophy"? Not sure what you are talking about here, maybe the difference between center and slot? All the other things you mentioned just make it much easier to officiate the game. That's why the NBA does it much the same way or vice versa. All that aside, we are discussing if we should rotate strong side or not in the above mentioned situation. I say yes and would do so everytime. I have never heard at any camp I have gone to stay and referee as the lead on the weak side of the floor. Would you go from strong side to weak side if just the ball and two players were strong side? I wouldn't. I'd wait for the players to come across to me. The players, especially post players are going to go where they can get the ball, and if the ball is on the opposite side of the floor from them, they are going to go across and get in position to get the ball. If you are weak side, why not go strong side and beat them there? If the ball gets swung..........go back. If you don't rotate and they start to move across now you are too late.

[TD21]

JRut....let's say we are working a game together and we decide in the pregame that we aren't going to rotate strong side if all the other players are on the weak side of the floor. Now what does each of the three officials do? My guess would be the Lead stays with the post players, the Trail stays with players in his/her primary and the Center does what? The C has the ball but does he stay in the C and turn and officiate or does he move up the floor and make the crew have two Trails? I know its ok to have two Centers but I don't think its good to have two Trail officials. How close to half court, do you think the center should go before the lead does rotate? Should the lead never rotate in this situation? If the lead doesn't and the ball is at just across half court, what happens if the ball gets turned over? Do we keep our same positions in transition? Or do we rotate as we come up the floor? These are all things we need to take into consideration when we talk about wether we should or shouldn't rotate. I understand that we all have our reasons for rotating or not. I know why I do it the way I do I'm just trying to get some information as to why people do it other ways. I'm not sure if this is something you could pregame.

[JRutledge]

TD21,

I have been blessed to work almost all of my 12 years with some extensive 3 Person Mechanics. And definitely 10 of those years the vast majority of my schedule has been working 3 Person on a nightly basis.

I do not recall that I have ever had a pre-game about all the possibilities of a rotation. The only thing I might say about rotations is rotate with a purpose and do not rotate just to rotate. After that I would expect that you are assigned the game because the assignor or supervisor thinks you are competent enough in the system to work a game. And pre-games in my opinion are to just get to know your partners and not to talk more about detail mechanics and have a rules clinic. I honestly do not know why that is so hard to understand. I said I would not rotate in the situation described based on my experience in 3 Person and following the things in this state that are taught. I think I am pretty qualified to know what is expected considering that I work for the head clinician and rules interpreter for the state of Illinois and I have talked with him extensively about what he wants officials to do in Illinois. I have also been picked to teach those mechanics and I am sure if I did not know what I was doing I would not be put in the position I have been given. And it does not bother me one bit if you do it differently. But for an official in this state to insist that the OPer had to rotate is not accurate. And based on what I have read (and I was correct) the official speaking had college experience. And one of the biggest problems we have around here is we have college official that insist on doing the things the college way (especially on the Women's side) and it hurts them when people consider them for certain assignments and opportunities.

Peace

[daveg144]

At the three camps I attended last summer (2 women's college and one high school) the philosophy regarding rotation was pretty consistent. With the exception of the difference in coverage (women's college lead has three point shot in corner), the reasons to rotate are simply to get in the best position to see the play. One clinician summed it up like this, "If you think you need to rotate, then rotate.". That may seem simple, but it makes sense. How many times have you been in the lead and for whatever reason you find yourself on the weak side (maybe the ball has been going back and forth and never seems to settle on one side or the other)? My first thought is, "get over there!".

In the poster's original play, it's hard to say whether he should have rotated or not without seeing anything. So far this year in my scrimmages, I have rotated more than last year and it's just so I can be in the best position to see the whole play. I tell my partners that I rotate a lot, but I don't rotate just to rotate. Again, it's just to see the play better.

That's my $.02.

[TD21]

I agree that we all learn different things at camps based on where you attend, what level the camp is and who is running the camp. But do you think this is another philosophy difference based on what region you work, or what level of basketball you work? Or is it just a preference issue? The only reason I ask is because I would rotate in that situation in any game I work, no matter the level. I know the differences in the mechanics and court coverages but that doesn't change the fact that I would want to be strong side as the Lead. That's my preference and I believe that works the best. I am assuming , by this thread, that others do it differently, based on what they've been taught. I don't buy into the thought that it has to do with which side, men/women (and its application to highschool games) you work. My guess, and I could be wrong, is it is more of who you are learning from. I think we all get taught/told how to do things, we try them and if we like them we use it in our game and if we don't we do it a different way. I think this maybe one of those things. I don't know if either way is wrong. I guess it is what works for you and you think is best to put yourself in the best position to referee that play. At the end on of the day its all about being in the best position to referee.