Throw In Violation?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I have been climbing up into the attic the last couple of days to read old rules books and casebook plays.

I went through:

1) Rules books, casebooks, handbooks, and officials manuals, supplemental
rules interpretations, and mid-season bulletins of the following
organizations going back as far back as the 1971-72 season:
a) Nat'l. Bkb. Comm. of the U.S. and Canada (NBCUSC)/NFHS/NCAA
Men's & Women's
b) Nat'l. Assn. of Girls' and Women's in Sports (NAGWS).
c) International Federation of Basketball Assciations (FIBA).

2) Every copy of Referee Magazine going back to its very first issue and
every rules as well as every NASO publicatioin going back to when NASO
was founded.

3) Every copy of the IAABO Sportorial that I have ever received.


I have found the following things:

1) The definition of when a throw-in starts and ends has not changed over
the years.

2) When the AP Arrow is reversed was changed to its current rule no more
than a couple of years after the AP Arrow was adopted.

3) I could not find a single play like the one in the O(riginal) P(ost).

4) The Ruling in NCAA A.R. 155 is wrong. In fact there is no rule support
for the ruling made in A.R. 155.

Whoever in the NCAA came up with the ruling in A.R. 155 did not read the rules book. Furthermore, whoever wrote the ruling applied rules that apply to Designated Spot Throw-ins, not for Throw-ins After a Goal. The entire ruling is nonsense. This is just another example of a ruling being made withoug applying the rules.

MTD, Sr.

I agree with you 100%.
However, since that silly A.R. is in the CURRENT rules book and CURRENTLY is the official ruling. It would pretty hard to defend NOT calling it that way in a game.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I agree with you 100%.
However, since that silly A.R. is in the CURRENT rules book and CURRENTLY is the official ruling. It would pretty hard to defend NOT calling it that way in a game.

NevadaRef:

I agreee with your last sentence but I could not in good concience enforce a ruling that is 100% wrong by rule.

MTD, Sr.