a rough night

[Old School]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

I certainly hope that you are not mentoring people in your association. Should someone step in and change the other guy's calls because he is more senior even though the changed call is wrong? That is what you imply here.

That is not what I am implying. As I stated, I'm withholding judgement because I was not there. The R did not change the officials call. The call was a foul on B2, this did not get changed. What got changed was the tables decision that we are now in the bonus. The R could have misread the scoreboard and thought the team foul count went to the other team, therefore, we are not shooting. I have made this mistake plenty of times. I have also seen the table credit this count to the wrong team.

My point simply was, let's not be so right that we rule out any other possibly and become defensive about our calls. This can lead to some nasty consequences of which nobody wins. I think as a society we are too quick to judge, especially when we don't have all the information.

I have had personal experience with a senior partner changing my call in the game, in a very BIG game. The point I want everyone to know, especially new officials to the trade. The show is not about us! The game must go on. No official can change another officials call. However, when officials disagree, now the burden switches to the R and the R is responsible to make a decision. All of you are responsible to move the game on. Get the ball back in play asap. Discuss the play at a timeout, after the game, or if bad enough, with the assigner after the game.

Peace

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Old School

1) I have had personal experience with a senior partner changing my call in the game, in a very BIG game.

2) No official can change another officials call. However, when officials disagree, now the burden switches to the R and the R is responsible to make a decision.

2) If no official can change another official's call, then how can the R subsequently change another official's call? Please cite the rule # where I may find that the R is responsible to make a decision when officials disagree. That statement seems to be directly contradicted by rule 2-6 and a statement found in case book 2.6SitA. I'll leave you to look those statements up in your rule book and case book and comment on why they completely contradict what you are saying.

[refnrev]

Just remember your next game has got to get better! Also, in some areas where there is no shortage of officials not working V ball after 4 years is a very common thing. Or its very possible that your guy is not very good. You make the call!

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

If no official can change another official's call, then how can the R subsequently change another official's call? Please cite the rule # where I may find that the R is responsible to make a decision when officials disagree. That statement seems to be directly contradicted by rule 2-6 and a statement found in case book 2.6SitA. I'll leave you to look those statements up in your rule book and case book and comment on why they completely contradict what you are saying.

Based on what was reported here, the R didn't attempt to change a call. However, if the officials disagree, what would you recommend they do? Continue to argue about it until they come to blows. Referees are proud people, now you got two very proud people officiating this game and neither will give in on there position. What do you do next? Maybe it's not specifically stated in the rulebook but I would not have a problem with the R for the game making a decision and saying let's move on. The point being we got a decision, made by the Lead Official for the game and now we are going to move on.



Peace

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Old School

However, if the officials disagree, what would you recommend they do?

What does the rule and case book tell the officials to do when they disagree?

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

What does the rule and case book tell the officials to do when they disagree?

It doesn't specifically.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Old School

It doesn't specifically.

oooo, wrong answer, OS, better hit that edit button fast or you're gonna get....


(insert appropriate gif here)

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Old School

It doesn't specifically.

Um, no....

Again, the rules citations are NFHS rule 2-6 and case book play 2-6SITA-RULING. All you have to do is look them up in your rule book and case book, and tell me why those citations aren't relevant. I think that they are.

I await your response.

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Um, no....

Again, the rules citations are NFHS rule 2-6 and case book play 2-6SITA-RULING. All you have to do is look them up in your rule book and case book, and tell me why those citations aren't relevant. I think that they are.

I await your response.

No official has the authority to change another officials decision. JR, that's fine and dandy but disagreements do occur. It's a fact of life. Whether an official is suppose to or not, is not where this person is here today posting this situation, it is also not the real world. Maybe in the games you do this never happens, but in the games I have done, it has occasionally happened, and yes, there are some arrogant officials who will try and overrule your call and control the game. If you're unwilling to admit this never happens, than we are done talking. Just like it's a crime to steal. Just because the code of law says it's illegal doesn't mean it never happens. I've always approach the rulebook as a guide, not an absolute. Not everything is written that can possibly happen to you on the court. Now we got to deal with it. Just like if I walk in and catch a robber in my home. Sure, it should never happen because it's against the law, but guess what, it happens and I now got to deal with it because this thief is in my house right now.

Sh!t Happens