The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 07:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Question Is this a carry/travel or is it legit.

The other day in a game of basketball, i did this play, but one of my buddies thinks it was a carry or a travel, yet none of the refs called it. I have done this move a few times in my history of playing ball (a good 20 years) and have never been called for it. So can we please get some opinions on it.

The play:

The opposition had a shot, missed and one of my team mates gets the rebound. I am up ahead so he throws me the ball. But instead of coming straight to me, it sort of passes me on my left, and is heading to an opposition player. So the opposition player and myself are going for the ball. I chase the ball, and manage to touch/tap the ball above the opposition players head just as he gets to it. The ball goes over his head, and i keep running through, and then catch it. Am i allowed to dribble to ball, or do i have to pass it?

I have looked at a whole bunch of rules, including Fiba, and there is no real mention of this type of situation. I have seen it in games before (NBA, NBL (Australian basketball comp)), and nothing has been called.

So what are peoples thoughts on this?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 07:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Without seeing it, we can't give you a black and white answer.

If you controlled the ball when you batted it, then you started a dribble. When you caught the ball, that dribble ended. Therefore, you can't dribble again.

Evidently, the official didn't see the bat as control, in which case it would be legal for you to begin a dribble after gaining possession.

Yeah, I know....clear as mud. But that's the rule. It's up to the official to judge the difference.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 07:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Without seeing it, we can't give you a black and white answer.

If you controlled the ball when you batted it, then you started a dribble. When you caught the ball, that dribble ended. Therefore, you can't dribble again.

Evidently, the official didn't see the bat as control, in which case it would be legal for you to begin a dribble after gaining possession.

Yeah, I know....clear as mud. But that's the rule. It's up to the official to judge the difference.
Furthermore, if the bat were to be considered a dribble, it would be an illegal dribble to catch the ball before it hits the floor (as the OP seems to be describing). So, its not a question of dribbing again.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 07:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
so, what i comes down to is the interpretation of "control". There was no real control of the ball when myself and the opposition player where going for the ball. I managed to flick/tap the ball to my favour.

What about this scenario:

Imagine 2 opposing players going for the rebound. As the rebound came down, one of the players managed to tap it up in the air to his side, and then caught it as it was coming down. Is he allowed to dribble or does he have to pass?

This is a very similiar to the original problem but a different take.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 08:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by btwong
so, what i comes down to is the interpretation of "control". There was no real control of the ball when myself and the opposition player where going for the ball. I managed to flick/tap the ball to my favour.

What about this scenario:

Imagine 2 opposing players going for the rebound. As the rebound came down, one of the players managed to tap it up in the air to his side, and then caught it as it was coming down. Is he allowed to dribble or does he have to pass?

This is a very similiar to the original problem but a different take.
Taps off a rebound are not considered control.

I would be very surprised if you got called for a double dribble off this play.

Very surprised.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 08:23pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by btwong
so, what i comes down to is the interpretation of "control". .
If the ball comes to rest on your hand, you're deemed to have control. It's a judgment call.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 08:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
If the ball comes to rest on your hand, you're deemed to have control. It's a judgment call.
yep i can understand that. But if it came to rest with me, i wouldn't need to tip/bat it out of the way, as dribbling around him would have been fine. But it was 2 players going for the ball. I tipped/batted/whatever in my favour, (which would have been a split second tap), and then i caught it, started dribbling and all was good.

Thanks for your help people. Obviously it comes down to actually seeing the play and how much control i had over the ball. Its not like i dribbled around, then flicked it over his head, and then dribbled onwards.

thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 10:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by btwong
yep i can understand that. But if it came to rest with me, i wouldn't need to tip/bat it out of the way, as dribbling around him would have been fine. But it was 2 players going for the ball. I tipped/batted/whatever in my favour, (which would have been a split second tap), and then i caught it, started dribbling and all was good.

Thanks for your help people. Obviously it comes down to actually seeing the play and how much control i had over the ball. Its not like i dribbled around, then flicked it over his head, and then dribbled onwards.

thank you.
Well, actually....

If you're dribbling, bat the ball over the opponent's head, allow it to hit the ground, you can continue dribbling
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 20, 2006, 10:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
Well, actually....

If you're dribbling, bat the ball over the opponent's head, allow it to hit the ground, you can continue dribbling
that seems sort of wierd to me.
so you can dribble up the court, and when the opposition comes to defend, you can hit/bat the ball over their head, wait for the bounce, and without catching, continue to dribble? That would seem like a carry as well as a travel to me. And thats something i have never seen in a game!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 21, 2006, 01:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by btwong
that seems sort of wierd to me.
so you can dribble up the court, and when the opposition comes to defend, you can hit/bat the ball over their head, wait for the bounce, and without catching, continue to dribble? That would seem like a carry as well as a travel to me. And thats something i have never seen in a game!
Yep, fully and completely legal....but unlikely that you'll ever see it.

This particular action goes back a loooonng way. The original dribble was not like we know it today. At one time the dribble was executed by tapping the ball up in the air repeatedly without it ever touching the ground. This form of dribbling grew out of the original rules that only prohibited running while holding the ball. It has been called an air dribble. This was deemed to be to much of an advantage so the rules were changed to say that the ball must be allowed to touch the floor between dribbles. The direction of the dribble is not restricted, only that it touch the floor.

A carry is NOT about the position of the hand relative to the ball but about what the hand actually does with the ball when in contact. Batting it upwards is not a carry because the ball is never caught (it does not come to rest).

It is also not a travel since traveling can only occur while holding the ball in all but one case (not this one).
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
carry or palming dguig Basketball 10 Thu Nov 11, 2004 08:33am
Carry JLC Basketball 10 Thu Feb 26, 2004 04:25pm
Legit or Self-Pass? Jay Basketball 11 Thu Dec 13, 2001 06:38pm
The "Carry" are we all calling it the same? Peter Devana Basketball 18 Tue Nov 06, 2001 11:44am
"Carry!" Mark Dexter Basketball 2 Sun Dec 17, 2000 10:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1