Quote:
Originally posted by refTN
blindzebra can you please point me in the direction of which or as many of those citations that you used that says just because a ball is fumbled in the player's hand that it doesn't constitute him still being an airbone shooter, or in continous motion when he gets fouled.
and by the way you gave the kid two shots when he got fouled, right?
|
The player in this situation is still an airborne shooter until he lands- R4-1-1. That isn't relevant to his "continuous motion" however. The shooter's "continuous motion"
ended when the ball was clearly in flight- as per R4-11-1. When he recovered the ball, he started
another second, separate try along with a second accompanying "continuous motion" associated with that separate try.
Yup, it's gotta be 2 shots on the original foul. The ball didn''t go in on
that try.
Sun Jan 15, 2006, 08:53am
Threaded Mode
