|
Thu Sep 16, 2004, 05:24pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I follow your logic
And it sounds good.
If a state has not adopted the coaching box rule - and I doubt that any of them have NOT, then the coach could not stand for anything but those specific items listed in 10-5. My point was that the coaching box definition (1-13) says that it's only use is to coach and instruct players. And that use, of coaching and instructing, is what I assumed the coach would lose. It's great to see some rules discussion starting again! 
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
