Double Foul Before Try Is Released

[SNIPERBBB]

Guessing it's not the NFHS Basketball or Basketball Official Forum pages as thTa the ok only ones other than the state page I follow for basketball.

Would be nice for a direct case play for this.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Guessing it's not the NFHS Basketball or Basketball Official Forum pages as thTa the ok only ones other than the state page I follow for basketball.

Would be nice for a direct case play for this.

It's REF CHAT, officials mostly based out of the NYC area and North Jersey. The guy who runs it is a friend of mine from when he used to officiate down here in Virginia. But he's also one of the ones pushing the narrative that ball status does not matter in this situation.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

[bob jenkins]

It's been discussed here several times, and never sufficiently resolved, to my way of thinking.

[JRutledge]

I think you can only have continuous motion on a defensive foul. A double foul would kill the play IMO because it does not fit the premise of a defensive foul. Just like a blarge can result in a GT or BI if a player commits that violation and the ball has been released. I get that this is probably a non-addressed situation in the rules or interpretation, but the rules seem to make the intention clear. But I have been wrong before taking similar stances.

Peace

[Zoochy]

go to 6:20 of the video
https://mshsaa.tv/?B=845534

Double foul (Blarge) before release.
Did the officials get it right?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

go to 6:20 of the video

https://mshsaa.tv/?B=845534



Double foul (Blarge) before release.

Did the officials get it right?

Not in my opinion. But this is the same crew that messed up the opening tip, so who knows what they were thinking or applying.

Based on the throw-in, they ruled the double foul occurred after the release and counted the goal with the POI being the defensive team's throw-in.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Does continuous motion apply to a double foul?

[Zoochy]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Not in my opinion. But this is the same crew that messed up the opening tip, so who knows what they were thinking or applying.

Based on the throw-in, they ruled the double foul occurred after the release and counted the goal with the POI being the defensive team's throw-in.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Nope, this was from last year. The non calling official is a female. No female in my previous Jump Ball/Backcourt thread.
See https://forum.officiating.com/basket...-blarge-2.html

[Mike Goodwin]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

go to 6:20 of the video
https://mshsaa.tv/?B=845534

Double foul (Blarge) before release.
Did the officials get it right?

Oof, not a good way to start out. When G20 received the pass, W11 became the primary defender and that matchup was in Center's PCA. Lead signaled quickly (as is often the case). The two whistles were nearly the same length, so it's plausible that Center didn't hear it and also did not 'post and hold' then make eye contact with Lead before signaling. At the time of G20's PCF (his part of the eventual double-foul call), the ball had not been released, so scoring the goal was incorrect. The ball should have been awarded to Gold at the closer of the two, 3' marks on the end line in Gold's front court as they had team control at the time of the double foul, per 4-36-2a(1).