Throw-in Violation or Out of Bounds Violation

[Afrosheen]

Thank you all for clarifying this!

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Afrosheen

Thank you all for clarifying this!

A great question that pops up occasionally because some older veteran officials may remember it from ancient times officiating as a throwin violation, and some less older veteran officials may remember it as a throwin violation from their ancient times playing days.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Afrosheen

Thank you all for clarifying this!

I remember Afro Sheen hair care products sponsoring the musical dance television show Soul Train hosted by Don Cornelius in the 1970’s.

I’m a white guy but I enjoyed Motown style rhythm and blues music and soul music, and I still do to this day.

The "Line Dances" were great.

[Scrapper1]

Devil's Advocate:

9-2-11: No teammates of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins.

Since A2 went OOB to catch the throw-in pass, perhaps A2 violated before even touching the ball. That would make it a throw-in violation.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Devil's Advocate: 9-2-11: No teammates of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins. Since A2 went OOB to catch the throw-in pass, perhaps A2 violated before even touching the ball. That would make it a throw-in violation.

Good point and possibly the reason for the old interpretation.

And possibly another example of a well intentioned NFHS rule and interpretation change where the NFHS did not do their thorough due diligence and properly edit all rule language in regard to the change.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Devil's Advocate:

9-2-11: No teammates of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins.

Since A2 went OOB to catch the throw-in pass, perhaps A2 violated before even touching the ball. That would make it a throw-in violation.

I believe the intent of that rule is not allow them to switch throwers (or to have a teammate standing OOB as if they would be a thrower). I don't think it is meant to apply to a teammate trying to catch the throwin but going OOB in trying to do so.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I believe the intent of that rule is not allow them to switch throwers (or to have a teammate standing OOB as if they would be a thrower). I don't think it is meant to apply to a teammate trying to catch the throwin but going OOB in trying to do so.

I actually agree with you 100%. I was just trying to stir the pot, maybe generate some discussion. But the intent of the rule is clearly for the original scenario to be an OOB violation.

[Nevadaref]

If A1 is the thrower and A2 crosses the boundary plane on the same end line or side line as the thrower before catching the throw-in pass, which does not break the plane of the boundary, this could certainly be a throw-in violation per 9-2-3.