Simultaneous Foul Involving Shooter

[Smitty]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

That makes sense. Imagine this conversation...

Coach: Why did you call a foul on A2?
Official: It was a rebounding foul on him.
Coach: What rebound?
Official: Well, if it wasn't for the foul against the shooter, and the shot missed, there would have been a rebound.
Coach: But there was no rebound, so how can there be a foul on it?

Yeah, I'm sure you can explain a simultaneous foul and whatnot. Just thought that conversation would be funny. Or not.. you can decide. LOL

I agree with Bob, but in your scenario, saying it was a rebounding foul is just the wrong thing to say in general. It was a push. Keep it simple and to the point, otherwise you open yourself up to the kinds of conversations you're imagining.

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by Smitty

I agree with Bob, but in your scenario, saying it was a rebounding foul is just the wrong thing to say in general. It was a push. Keep it simple and to the point, otherwise you open yourself up to the kinds of conversations you're imagining.

Yeah, I agree. That type of conversation Just came into my head, and I wanted to share it.