Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:29pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official
No, what you just described is a multiple foul, not a simultaneous foul. A simultaneous foul is just like the situation described in the OP. A double foul is two opponents committing fouls against each other, which is not what happened in the OP.
But for the purposes of the definition of "common foul," any foul that is part of a double, simultaneous, or multiple foul is not a common foul.
|
yes you are correct, i brain farted between the 2.
__________________
in OS I trust
|